Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29084832›Full record

ReviewPediatrics2017

Cord Blood Banking for Potential Future Transplantation.

William T Shearer, Bertram H Lubin, Mitchell S Cairo, Luigi D Notarangelo, SECTION ON HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY, SECTION ON ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Hybrid umbilical cord blood banking: literature review.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Rejuvenating the human gut microbiome.Trends in molecular medicine · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. How Knowledge about Stem Cells Influences Attitudes towards Breastfeeding: Case Study of Polish Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Identifying Barriers to Umbilical Cord Blood Banking in Jordan: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Obstetricians.International journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

William T Shearer
Bertram H Lubin
Mitchell S Cairo
Luigi D Notarangelo
SECTION ON HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY
SECTION ON ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY

Funding

Characterization of the cellular and molecular bases of inborn errors of immunityZIAAI001222 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI NOTARANGELO, LUIGI · 2017 to 2025
$15.2M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AI999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This policy statement is intended to provide information to guide pediatricians, obstetricians, and other medical specialists and health care providers in responding to parents' questions about cord blood donation and banking as well as the types (public versus private) and quality of cord blood banks. Cord blood is an excellent source of stem cells for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with some fatal diseases. Cord blood transplantation offers another method of definitive therapy for infants, children, and adults with certain hematologic malignancies, hemoglobinopathies, severe forms of T-lymphocyte and other immunodeficiencies, and metabolic diseases. The development of universal screening for severe immunodeficiency assay in a growing number of states is likely to increase the number of cord blood transplants. Both public and private cord blood banks worldwide hold hundreds of thousands of cord blood units designated for the treatment of fatal or debilitating illnesses. The procurement, characterization, and cryopreservation of cord blood is free for families who choose public banking. However, the family cost for private banking is significant and not covered by insurance, and the unit may never be used. Quality-assessment reviews by several national and international accrediting bodies show private cord blood banks to be underused for treatment, less regulated for quality control, and more expensive for the family than public cord blood banks. There is an unquestionable need to study the use of cord blood banking to make new and important alternative means of reconstituting the hematopoietic blood system in patients with malignancies and blood disorders and possibly regenerating tissue systems in the future. Recommendations regarding appropriate ethical and operational standards (including informed consent policies, financial disclosures, and conflict-of-interest policies) are provided for physicians, institutions, and organizations that operate or have a relationship with cord blood banking programs. The information on all aspects of cord blood banking gathered in this policy statement will facilitate parental choice for public or private cord blood banking.

Indexed as

Academies and InstitutesBlood BanksChildCord Blood Stem Cell TransplantationFetal BloodHealth PolicyHematologic DiseasesHumansPediatricsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29084832
PMCPMC6091883

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.