ReviewDer Anaesthesist2019
Preoperative evaluation of adult patients before elective, noncardiothoracic surgery : Joint recommendation of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, the German Society of Surgery, and the German Society of Internal Medicine.
Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pulmonary Function Tests for the Prediction of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2022Pooled it
- Can preoperative spirometry be omitted for HBP surgery?Surgery today · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of an algorithm to predict intraoperative risk of inadvertent hypothermia based on preoperative data.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Perioperative care of cardiac patient's candidate for non-cardiac surgery: a critical appraisal of emergent evidence and international guidelines.Internal and emergency medicine · 2018Review
- Information technology-based joint preoperative assessment, risk stratification and its impact on patient management, perioperative outcome, and cost.Discoveries (Craiova, Romania)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evaluation of the patient's medical history and a physical examination are the cornerstones of risk assessment prior to elective surgery, and may help to optimize the patient's preoperative medical condition and guide perioperative management. Whether performance of additional technical tests (e. g., blood chemistry, electrocardiography, spirometry, chest x‑ray) can contribute to reduction of the perioperative risk is often not well known or controversial. Similarly, there is considerable uncertainty among anesthesiologists, internists, and surgeons with respect to perioperative management of the patient's long-term medication. Therefore, the German Scientific Societies of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI), Internal Medicine (DGIM), and Surgery (DGCH) have joined to elaborate recommendations on the preoperative evaluation of adult patients prior to elective noncardiothoracic surgery which were initially published in 2010. These recommendations have now been updated based on the current literature and existing international guidelines. In the first part, the general principles of preoperative evaluation are described (part A). The current concepts for extended evaluation of patients with known or suspected major cardiovascular disease are presented in part B. Finally, the perioperative management of patients' long-term medication is discussed (part C). The concepts proposed in these interdisciplinary recommendations endorsed by the DGAI, DGIM, and DGCH provide a common basis for structured preoperative risk assessment and management. These recommendations aim to ensure that surgical patients undergo a rational preoperative assessment and, at the same time, aim to avoid unnecessary, costly, and potentially dangerous testing. The joint recommendations reflect the current state-of-the-art knowledge as well as expert opinions, because scientific-based evidence is not always available. These recommendations will be subject to regular re-evaluation and updating when new validated evidence becomes available.Contribution available free of charge by "Free Access".
Indexed as
Identifiers
29098342What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.