ReviewRNA biology2018
What makes ribosomes tick?
Review in RNA biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circadian Control of Protein Synthesis.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Frontiers in plant RNA research in ICAR2023: from lab to innovative agriculture.Plant molecular biology · 2024Article
- Diurnal dynamics of the Arabidopsis rosette proteome and phosphoproteome.Plant, cell & environment · 2021Article
- Circadian rhythms, metabolic oscillators, and the target of rapamycin (TOR) pathway: the Neurospora connection.Current genetics · 2019Review
- The Plant Circadian Oscillator.Biology · 2019Review
- Dynamics of the Pollen Sequestrome Defined by Subcellular Coupled Omics.Plant physiology · 2018Article
- A component of the TOR (Target Of Rapamycin) nutrient-sensing pathway plays a role in circadian rhythmicity in Neurospora crassa.PLoS genetics · 2018Article
- Phosphorylation of Ribosomal Protein RPS6 Integrates Light Signals and Circadian Clock Signals.Frontiers in plant science · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In most organisms, gene expression over the course of the day is under the control of the circadian clock. The canonical clock operates as a gene expression circuit that is controlled at the level of transcription, and transcriptional control is also a major clock output. However, rhythmic transcription cannot explain all the observed rhythms in protein accumulation. Although it is clear that rhythmic gene expression also involves RNA processing and protein turnover, until two years ago little was known in any eukaryote about diel dynamics of mRNA translation into protein. A recent series of studies in animals and plants demonstrated that diel cycles of translation efficiency are widespread across the tree of life and its transcriptomes. There are surprising parallels between the patterns of diel translation in mammals and plants. For example, ribosomal proteins and mitochondrial proteins are under translational control in mouse liver, human tissue culture, and Arabidopsis seedlings. In contrast, the way in which the circadian clock, light-dark changes, and other environmental factors such as nutritional signals interact to drive the cycles of translation may differ between organisms. Further investigation is needed to identify the signaling pathways, biochemical mechanisms, RNA sequence features, and the physiological implications of diel translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.