Evidence mapPaperPMID 29111980Full record

Trial reportAnatolian journal of cardiology2017

Impact of continuation of metformin prior to elective coronary angiography on acute contrast nephropathy in patients with normal or mildly impaired renal functions.

Veysel Oktay, İlknur Calpar Çıralı, Ümit Yaşar Sinan, Ahmet Yıldız, Murat Kazım Ersanlı

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03980990 (Metformin Continuation Versus Interruption Following Coronary Angiography), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03980990 phase4unknown statusstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Metformin Continuation Versus Interruption Following Coronary Angiography: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Ran2019Enrolled500Registered outcomes3Posted comparisons0ConditionsAcute Coronary Syndrome, Diabetes Mellitus, Metformin Adverse Reaction, Unstable AnginaArmsMetformin
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Metformin, arterial contrast and acute kidney Injury.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Author`s Reply.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Veysel OktayDepartment of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, İstanbul University; İstanbul-Turkey. drvoktay@gmail.com.
İlknur Calpar Çıralı
Ümit Yaşar Sinan
Ahmet Yıldız
Murat Kazım Ersanlı
Istanbul University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDiscontinuation of metformin treatment in patients scheduled for elective coronary angiography (CAG) is controversial because of post-procedural risks including acute contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) and lactic acidosis (LA). This study aims to discuss the safety of continuing metformin treatment in patients undergoing elective CAG with normal or mildly impaired renal functions.

methodsOur study was designed as a single-centered, randomized, and observational study including 268 patients undergoing elective CAG with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of >60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Of these patients, 134 continued metformin treatment during angiography, whereas 134 discontinued it 24 h before the procedure. CIN was defined as either a 25% relative increase in serum creatinine levels from the baseline or a 0.5 mg/dL increase in the absolute value that measured 48 h after CAG. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of CIN and LA after CAG.

resultsBoth groups were comparable in terms of demographics and laboratory values. CIN at 48 h was 8% (11/134) in the metformin continued group and 6% (8/134) in the metformin discontinued group (p=0.265). Patients in neither of the groups developed metformin-induced LA. Based on multiple regression analysis, the ejection fraction [p=0.029, OR: 0.760; 95% CI (0.590-0.970)] and contrast volume [p=0.016, OR: 0.022 95% CI (0.010-0.490)] were independent predictors of CIN.

conclusionPatients scheduled for elective CAG with normal or mildly impaired renal functions and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (>40%) may safely continue metformin treatment.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyContrast MediaCreatinineDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Drug Administration ScheduleFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMaleMetforminMiddle AgedRenal InsufficiencyTreatment OutcomeContrast MediaCreatinineHypoglycemic AgentsMetformin

Identifiers

PMID29111980
PMCPMC5731282
OpenAlexW2767233522

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.