Trial reportAnatolian journal of cardiology2017
Impact of continuation of metformin prior to elective coronary angiography on acute contrast nephropathy in patients with normal or mildly impaired renal functions.
Trial report in Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03980990 (Metformin Continuation Versus Interruption Following Coronary Angiography), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Metformin Continuation Versus Interruption Following Coronary Angiography: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Open the trial in the graphWho cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of current guidelines, and their evidence base, on risk of renal function after administration of contrast medium for diabetic patients receiving metformin.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Renal Complications after Percutaneous Coronary Interventions on Concurrent Metformin Therapy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Clinical medicine & research · 2023Pooled it
- Continuous use of metformin in patients receiving contrast medium: what is the evidence? A systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2022Pooled it
- Association of Metformin with the Mortality and Incidence of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Pre-existing Cardiovascular Diseases.Drugs · 2022 · on this mapPooled it
- Metformin Can Be Safely Used in Patients Exposed to Contrast Media: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cardiology · 2022Pooled it
- Letter to the Editor: "Continuous use of metformin in patients receiving contrast medium: What is the evidence? A systematic review and meta-analysis".European radiology · 2024Article
- Effect of continuous use of metformin on kidney function in diabetes patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2020Article
- Metformin, arterial contrast and acute kidney Injury.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2019Article
- Prevention of Contrast and Radiation Injury During Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2018Review
- Contrast-induced acute kidney injury/ contrast-induced nephropathy may be related to additional risk factors.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2018Article
- Author`s Reply.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDiscontinuation of metformin treatment in patients scheduled for elective coronary angiography (CAG) is controversial because of post-procedural risks including acute contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) and lactic acidosis (LA). This study aims to discuss the safety of continuing metformin treatment in patients undergoing elective CAG with normal or mildly impaired renal functions.
methodsOur study was designed as a single-centered, randomized, and observational study including 268 patients undergoing elective CAG with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of >60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Of these patients, 134 continued metformin treatment during angiography, whereas 134 discontinued it 24 h before the procedure. CIN was defined as either a 25% relative increase in serum creatinine levels from the baseline or a 0.5 mg/dL increase in the absolute value that measured 48 h after CAG. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of CIN and LA after CAG.
resultsBoth groups were comparable in terms of demographics and laboratory values. CIN at 48 h was 8% (11/134) in the metformin continued group and 6% (8/134) in the metformin discontinued group (p=0.265). Patients in neither of the groups developed metformin-induced LA. Based on multiple regression analysis, the ejection fraction [p=0.029, OR: 0.760; 95% CI (0.590-0.970)] and contrast volume [p=0.016, OR: 0.022 95% CI (0.010-0.490)] were independent predictors of CIN.
conclusionPatients scheduled for elective CAG with normal or mildly impaired renal functions and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (>40%) may safely continue metformin treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.