Evidence mapPaperPMID 29133791Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Network pharmacology exploration reveals endothelial inflammation as a common mechanism for stroke and coronary artery disease treatment of Danhong injection.

Ming Lyu, Chun-Lin Yan, Hai-Xin Liu, Tai-Yi Wang, Xin-Hui Shi, Jin-Ping Liu, John Orgah, Guan-Wei Fan, Ji-Hong Han, Xiao-Ying Wang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
16.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Network Pharmacology Study to Explore the Underlying Mechanism of Safflower (Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ming LyuTianjin State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese, Tianjin, China.
Chun-Lin YanTianjin State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese, Tianjin, China.
Hai-Xin LiuTianjin State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese, Tianjin, China.
Tai-Yi WangTianjin State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese, Tianjin, China.
Xin-Hui ShiTianjin State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese, Tianjin, China.
Jin-Ping LiuTianjin State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese, Tianjin, China.
John OrgahTianjin State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese, Tianjin, China.
Guan-Wei FanTianjin State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese, Tianjin, China.
Ji-Hong HanCollege of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Xiao-Ying WangTianjin State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese, Tianjin, China.
Yan ZhuTianjin State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese, Tianjin, China. yanzhu.harvard@icloud.com.
Tianjin International Joint Academy of Biomedicine · CNTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNFirst Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNNankai University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although Danhong injection (DHI) is the most widely prescribed Chinese medicine for both stroke and coronary artery disease (CAD), its underlying common molecular mechanisms remain unclear. An integrated network pharmacology and experimental verification approach was used to decipher common pharmacological mechanisms of DHI on stroke and CAD treatment. A compound-target-disease & function-pathway network was constructed and analyzed, indicating that 37 ingredients derived from DH (Salvia miltiorrhiza Bge., Flos Carthami tinctorii and DHI) modulated 68 common targets shared by stroke and CAD. In-depth network analysis results of the top diseases, functions, pathways and upstream regulators implied that a common underlying mechanism linking DHI's role in stroke and CAD treatment was inflammatory response in the process of atherosclerosis. Experimentally, DHI exerted comprehensive anti-inflammatory effects on LPS, ox-LDL or cholesterol crystal-induced NF-κB, c-jun and p38 activation, as well as IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-10 secretion in vascular endothelial cells. Ten of 14 predicted ingredients were verified to have significant anti-inflammatory activities on LPS-induced endothelial inflammation. DHI exerts pharmacological efficacies on both stroke and CAD through multi-ingredient, multi-target, multi-function and multi-pathway mode. Anti-endothelial inflammation therapy serves as a common underlying mechanism. This study provides a new understanding of DHI in clinical application on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases.

Indexed as

Cell LineCell SurvivalComputational BiologyCoronary Artery DiseaseDatasets as TopicDrugs, Chinese HerbalEndothelial CellsEndothelium, VascularHumansInflammationInjectionsStrokedanhongDrugs, Chinese Herbal

Identifiers

PMID29133791
PMCPMC5684234
OpenAlexW2767555394

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.