ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2017
Dietary Strategies to Reduce Environmental Impact: A Critical Review of the Evidence Base.
Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Traditional place-based diets and their effects on healthy and sustainable food transitions: a systematic literature review.Public health nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Aligning Environmental Sustainability, Health Outcomes, and Affordability in Diet Quality: A Systematic Review.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Pooled it
- The Water Footprint of Diets: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Pooled it
- Environmental co-benefits of a Mediterranean-style dietary intervention for reducing depressive symptoms in adults: results from the Curbing Anxiety and Depression using Lifestyle Medicine randomised controlled trial.The British journal of nutrition · 2025Trial
- Prevalence and Determinants of Eating Behaviors Among School-Going Children in Bangladesh: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nutrition and metabolic insights · 2026Article
- Assessing Environmental Hotspots and Sustainable Development Goal Alignment in Food Production in India.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
- Application of Global Warming Potential Star (GWP*) Values to the AUSNUT 2011-13 Food Composition Database: Creation of theNutrients · 2025Article
- A matrix approach to visually communicate simultaneously the environmental and health impacts of foods.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Modelling impacts of a salt and sugar tax on hypothetical intra-category food substitutions, BMI and environmental footprints in the UK population.European journal of nutrition · 2024Article
- Sustainability and cost of typical and heart-healthy dietary patterns in Australia.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024Article
- Traditional japanese diet score and the sustainable development goals by a global comparative ecological study.Nutrition journal · 2024Article
- Environmental impact and nutritional quality of adult diet in France based on fruit and vegetable intakes.European journal of nutrition · 2024Article
- What Is the Likely Impact of Alternative Proteins on Diet Quality, Health, and the Environment in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Current developments in nutrition · 2024Article
- Insight into the Sustainability of the Mediterranean Diet: The Water Footprint of the Recommended Italian Diet.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Environmental Impact of Two Plant-Based, Isocaloric and Isoproteic Diets: The Vegan Diet vs. the Mediterranean Diet.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Assessment of the Environmental Impact of Food Consumption in Ireland-Informing a Transition to Sustainable Diets.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Growing health: global linkages between patterns of food supply, sustainability, and vulnerability to climate change.The Lancet. Planetary health · 2022Review
- Towards healthier and more sustainable diets in the Australian context: comparison of current diets with the Australian Dietary Guidelines and the EAT-Lancet Planetary Health Diet.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Adhering to Canada's Food Guide Recommendations on Healthy Food Choices Increases the Daily Diet Cost: Insights from the PREDISE Study.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Health and sustainability co-benefits of eating behaviors: Towards a science of dietary eco-wellness.Preventive medicine reports · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The food system is a major source of environmental impact, and dietary change has been recommended as an important and necessary strategy to reduce this impact. However, assessing the environmental performance of diets is complex due to the many types of foods eaten and the diversity of agricultural production systems and local environmental settings. To assess the state of science and identify knowledge gaps, an integrative review of the broad topic of environment and diet was undertaken, with particular focus on the completeness of coverage of environmental concerns and the metrics used. Compared with the 14 discrete environmental areas of concern identified in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, the located journal literature mainly addressed greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and, to a lesser extent, land and water use. Some relevant concerns were rarely addressed or not addressed at all. In the case of GHG emissions, changes in land use and soil carbon stocks were seldom considered. This represents a disconnect between the science informing strategic climate action in the agricultural sector and the science informing public health nutrition. In the case of land and water use, few studies used metrics that are appropriate in a life-cycle context. Some metrics produce inherently biased results, which misinform about environmental impact. The limited evidence generally points to recommended diets having lower environmental impacts than typical diets, although not in every case. This is largely explained by the overconsumption of food energy associated with average diets, which is also a major driver of obesity. A shared-knowledge framework is identified as being needed to guide future research on this topic. Until the evidence base becomes more complete, commentators on sustainable diets should not be quick to assume that a dietary strategy to reduce overall environmental impact can be readily defined or recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.