Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29160693›Full record

ReviewAnalytical chemistry2018

Cross-Linking Mass Spectrometry: An Emerging Technology for Interactomics and Structural Biology.

Clinton Yu, Lan Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 176 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
176citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

176 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mapping the architecture of protein complexes inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Proteomics-Driven Strategies for Proximity-Inducing Drug Discovery.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

116 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Clinton YuDepartment of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine , Irvine, California 92697, United States.
Lan HuangDepartment of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine , Irvine, California 92697, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3140-4687

Funding

Proteomics of the Proteasome Interacting NetworksR01GM074830 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI HUANG, LAN · 2005 to 2022
$6.1M
In Vivo Interactome and Dynamics of Cullin-Ring LigasesR01GM106003 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI HUANG, LAN, RYCHNOVSKY, SCOTT D. · 2013 to 2016
$772k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074830NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM106003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMass SpectrometryCross-Linking ReagentsPeptidesCross-Linking ReagentsPeptides

Identifiers

PMID29160693
PMCPMC6022837

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.