Evidence mapPaperPMID 29168047Full record

SynthesisCurrent diabetes reports2017

Are Eating Disorders Risk Factors for Type 2 Diabetes? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Ramfis Nieto-Martínez, Juan P González-Rivas, José R Medina-Inojosa, Hermes Florez

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current diabetes reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06243536 (The Effect of Semaglutide on Disordered Eating Behaviour in Type 2 Diabetic Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06243536 phase4unknown statusstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Semaglutide on Disordered Eating Behaviour in Type 2 Diabetic Patients

Ran2024Enrolled60Registered outcomes3Posted comparisons0ConditionsDisordered Eating Behaviors, Overweight, Type 2 DiabetesArmssemaglutide, Standard of care
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Loneliness, Binge Eating, and Type 2 Diabetes: A Novel Theoretical Model Evaluation.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ramfis Nieto-MartínezGeriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC) and South Florida Veterans Affairs Foundation for Research & Education, Miami VA Healthcare System, Miami, FL, USA. ramfis.nieto-martinez@va.gov.
Juan P González-RivasThe Andes Clinic of Cardio-Metabolic Studies, Mérida, Venezuela.
José R Medina-InojosaDivision of Preventive Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Hermes FlorezGeriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC) and South Florida Veterans Affairs Foundation for Research & Education, Miami VA Healthcare System, Miami, FL, USA.
Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USUniversity of the Andes · VE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RECENT

findingsEating disorders (ED) affect energy intake modifying body fat depots. Prior evidence suggests that binge eating disorder (BED) and bulimia nervosa (BN) could increase the risk for type 2 diabetes (T2D), while anorexia nervosa (AN) could reduce it. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate if ED are risk factors for T2D. Ten studies were selected out of 1057 screened. Meta-analysis of six studies with T2D as outcome is reported. Among cross-sectional studies, both BED (OR 3.69, 95% CI [1.12-12.12]) and BN (OR 3.45 [1.92-6.1]) increased the risk of T2D, while AN was not associated with lower risk (OR 0.87 [0.40-1.88]). Cohort studies showed increased risk of T2D with BN (RR 1.7 [1.2-2.5]), and decreased risk with AN (RR 0.71 [0.52-0.98]), but for BED the association was less clear (OR 3.34 [0.85-13.12]). Limitations of studies and recommendations for future research are presented.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Feeding and Eating DisordersFemaleHumansRisk FactorsAnorexia nervosaBinge eating disorderBulimia nervosaDiabetes mellitus type 2Eating disordersNight eating syndrome

Identifiers

PMID29168047
OpenAlexW2769753631

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.