ReviewThe Lancet. Oncology2017
Future cancer research priorities in the USA: a Lancet Oncology Commission.
Review in The Lancet. Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
93 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Current status of cancer education in developing and developed countries: identifying the disparities and bridging the gap.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Identifying the effective behaviour change techniques in nutrition and physical activity interventions for the treatment of overweight/obesity in post-treatment breast cancer survivors: a systematic review.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2023Pooled it
- The clinical trials landscape for glioblastoma: is it adequate to develop new treatments?Neuro-oncology · 2018Pooled it
- Randomised clinical study: oral aspirin 325 mg daily vs placebo alters gut microbial composition and bacterial taxa associated with colorectal cancer risk.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2020Trial
- Synthesis of Enantiospecific Androgen Receptor Antagonists of Enzalutamide-Resistant Human Prostate Cancer Cells.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2026Article
- Digitally engaging participants in cancer clinical trials: Design and pilot of the Alliance Participant Engagement Portal (PEP).JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Article
- Therapy as a State-Generator: Dynamic Phenotypic Landscapes and Adaptive Stress Circuits in Chemotherapy Resistance of Breast Cancer.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Novel bayesian nonparametric unsupervised learning approach to precision symptom management in cancer survivors: a re-analysis of a comparative effectiveness trial.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2026Article
- Radiogenomics and the DNA damage response: opportunities for biomarker-guided radiosensitization in pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Wearable nanopatch platforms for real-time miRNA sensing and editing: a vision for next-generation cancer management.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Quality of Life (QoL) Among Patients with Esophageal Cancer Using Validated European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Bibliometric analysis of research on cervical cancer and miRNAs from 2010 to 2024: research trends, hotspots, and prospects.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Emerging biomarkers for early cancer detection and diagnosis: challenges, innovations, and clinical perspectives.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Advancing Global Cancer Symptom Science: Insights and Strategies From the Inaugural Cancer Symptom Science Expert Meeting.Oncology nursing forum · 2025Article
- Advancing Global Cancer Symptom Science: Insights and Strategies from the Inaugural Cancer Symptom Science Expert Meeting.Seminars in oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness of precision medicine in oncology setting in China: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2025Article
- [The Role of Fasting-Mimicking Diet in Cancer Therapy: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Clinical Prospects].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025Review
- New Kinase Inhibitors That Are Selectively Cytotoxic for Tumor Cells.Doklady. Biochemistry and biophysics · 2025Article
- Big data for neuroscience in the context of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine.The EPMA journal · 2025Review
- Deficits of Molecular Prognosis/Diagnosis Studies in Underserved Populations.JCO oncology practice · 2024Review
33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
54 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We are in the midst of a technological revolution that is providing new insights into human biology and cancer. In this era of big data, we are amassing large amounts of information that is transforming how we approach cancer treatment and prevention. Enactment of the Cancer Moonshot within the 21st Century Cures Act in the USA arrived at a propitious moment in the advancement of knowledge, providing nearly US$2 billion of funding for cancer research and precision medicine. In 2016, the Blue Ribbon Panel (BRP) set out a roadmap of recommendations designed to exploit new advances in cancer diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. Those recommendations provided a high-level view of how to accelerate the conversion of new scientific discoveries into effective treatments and prevention for cancer. The US National Cancer Institute is already implementing some of those recommendations. As experts in the priority areas identified by the BRP, we bolster those recommendations to implement this important scientific roadmap. In this Commission, we examine the BRP recommendations in greater detail and expand the discussion to include additional priority areas, including surgical oncology, radiation oncology, imaging, health systems and health disparities, regulation and financing, population science, and oncopolicy. We prioritise areas of research in the USA that we believe would accelerate efforts to benefit patients with cancer. Finally, we hope the recommendations in this report will facilitate new international collaborations to further enhance global efforts in cancer control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.