Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29209154›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition2017

Effects of two pre-workout supplements on concentric and eccentric force production during lower body resistance exercise in males and females: a counterbalanced, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Grant M Tinsley, Matthew A Hamm, Amy K Hurtado, Austin G Cross, Jose G Pineda, Austin Y Martin, Victor A Uribe, Ty B Palmer

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. International society of sports nutrition position stand: caffeine and exercise performance.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Grant M TinsleyEnergy Balance & Body Composition Laboratory, Musculoskeletal Assessment Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Box 43011, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA.
Matthew A HammEnergy Balance & Body Composition Laboratory, Musculoskeletal Assessment Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Box 43011, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA.
Amy K HurtadoEnergy Balance & Body Composition Laboratory, Musculoskeletal Assessment Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Box 43011, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA.
Austin G CrossEnergy Balance & Body Composition Laboratory, Musculoskeletal Assessment Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Box 43011, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA.
Jose G PinedaEnergy Balance & Body Composition Laboratory, Musculoskeletal Assessment Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Box 43011, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA.
Austin Y MartinEnergy Balance & Body Composition Laboratory, Musculoskeletal Assessment Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Box 43011, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA.
Victor A UribeEnergy Balance & Body Composition Laboratory, Musculoskeletal Assessment Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Box 43011, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA.
Ty B PalmerEnergy Balance & Body Composition Laboratory, Musculoskeletal Assessment Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Box 43011, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPre-workout supplements purportedly enhance feelings of energy, reduce fatigue and improve exercise performance. The purpose of this study was to examine the performance effects of caffeinated and non-caffeinated multi-ingredient pre-workout supplements.

methodsIn a counterbalanced, double-blind, placebo-controlled design, eccentric and concentric force production during lower body resistance exercise on a mechanized squat device were assessed after supplement ingestion. Repetitions-in-reserve/RPE and subjective feelings of energy, focus and fatigue were also examined. Twenty-one resistance-trained adults (12 F, 9 M) completed three conditions in random order: caffeinated supplement, non-caffeinated supplement and placebo. Subjects were not informed of the presence of a placebo condition. Thirty minutes after supplement ingestion, a 3-repetition maximum test and 5 sets of 6 repetitions were completed using the squat device. Each repetition involved 4-s eccentric and concentric phases, and the force signal throughout each repetition was sampled from a load cell contained within the squat device. The scaled and filtered force signals were analyzed using customized software. Repeated measures analysis of variance and appropriate follow-up analyses were utilized to compare dependent variables, and relevant effect sizes (d) were calculated.

resultsSupplement or placebo ingestion led to similar subjective responses (

conclusionsAs compared to placebo, caffeinated and non-caffeinated multi-ingredient pre-workout supplements failed to improve concentric and eccentric force production. In males, effect size data indicate a possible small benefit of supplementation on concentric force production, although this was not statistically significant. When resistance-trained subjects were unaware of the presence of a placebo, resistance exercise performance was similar regardless of whether a placebo or multi-ingredient supplement was ingested.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsResistance TrainingAnalysis of VarianceCaffeineDouble-Blind MethodFatigueFemaleFood, FormulatedHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalPhysical EnduranceSex FactorsSports Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaYoung AdultCaffeineBCAACaffeineCitrulline malateCreatine

Identifiers

PMID29209154
PMCPMC5704438

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.