Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29237455›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2017

Molecular and histological effects of MR-guided pulsed focused ultrasound to the rat heart.

Kee W Jang, Tsang-Wei Tu, Matthew E Nagle, Bobbi K Lewis, Scott R Burks, Joseph A Frank

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cytosolic CaTheranostics · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Effect of Pulsed Focused Ultrasound on the Native Pancreas.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kee W JangFrank Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr., Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. kee.jang@nih.gov.
Tsang-Wei TuFrank Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr., Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Matthew E NagleFrank Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr., Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Bobbi K LewisFrank Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr., Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Scott R BurksFrank Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr., Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Joseph A FrankFrank Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr., Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center · US

Funding

Preclinical high intensity focused ultrasound: mechanisms and applicationsZIACL040014 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI FRANK, JOSEPH · 2009 to 2025
$0k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImage-guided high intensity focused ultrasound has been used as an extracorporeal cardiac pacing tool and to enhance homing of stem cells to targeted tissues. However, molecular changes in the myocardium after sonication have not been widely investigated. Magnetic-resonance (MR)-guided pulsed focused ultrasound (pFUS) was targeted to the rat myocardium over a range of pressures and the microenvironmental and histological effects were evaluated over time.

methodsEight-to-ten-week-old Sprague-Dawley rats received T2-weighted MR images to target pFUS to the left ventricular and septum without cardiac or respiratory gating. Rats were sonicated through the thoracic wall at peak negative pressures (PNP) from 1 to 8 MPa at a center frequency of 1 MHz, 10 ms pulse duration and 1 Hz pulse repetition frequency for 100 pulses per focal target. Following pFUS, myocardium was harvested over 24 h and subjected to imaging, proteomic, and histological measurements.

resultspFUS to the myocardium increased expression of cytokines, chemokines, and trophic factors characterized by an initial increase in tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α followed by increases in pro- and anti-inflammatory factors that returned to baseline by 24 h. Immediately after pFUS, there was a transient (< 1 h) increase in N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) without elevation of other cardiac injury markers. A relationship between PNP and expression of TNF-α and NT-proBNP was observed with significant changes (p < 0.05 ANOVA) ≥ 4 MPa compared to untreated controls. Contrast-enhanced ex vivo T1-weighted MRI revealed vascular leakage in sonicated myocardium that was accompanied by the presence of albumin upon immunohistochemistry. Histology revealed infiltration of neutrophils and macrophages without morphological myofibril changes in sonicated tissue accompanied by pulmonary hemorrhage at PNP > 4 MPa.

conclusionsMR-guided pFUS to myocardium induced transient proteomic and histological changes. The temporal proteomic changes in the myocardium indicate a short-lived sterile inflammatory response consistent with ischemia or contusion. Further study of myocardial function and strain is needed to determine if pFUS could be developed as an experimental model of cardiac injury and chest trauma.

Indexed as

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationMagnetic Resonance ImagingAnimalsBiomarkersFemaleGranulocytesHeartMacrophagesMyocardiumProteomicsRats, Sprague-DawleyBiomarkersCardiac contusionFocused ultrasoundLung traumaMyocardiumProteomicsRatSterile inflammation

Identifiers

PMID29237455
PMCPMC5729396
OpenAlexW2774344160

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.