Evidence mapPaperPMID 29266804Full record

Trial reportESC heart failure2018

Safety profile and efficacy of ivabradine in heart failure due to Chagas heart disease: a post hoc analysis of the SHIFT trial.

Edimar Alcides Bocchi, Salvador Rassi, Guilherme Veiga Guimarães, Argentina, Chile, and Brazil SHIFT Investigators

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in ESC heart failure, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04853758 (Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition in Chagas Cardiomyopathy With Reduced Ejection Fraction), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04853758 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition in Chagas Cardiomyopathy With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Randomized Trial ANSWER-HF

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao Paulo General HospitalRan2021 to 2024Enrolled200ConditionsChagas CardiomyopathyArmsSacubitril / Valsartan Oral Tablet [Entresto], Enalapril
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Edimar Alcides BocchiHeart Institute (InCor), São Paulo University Medical School (HC-FUMSP), Rua Dr Melo Alves 690, 4o andar, Bairro Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo, São Paulo, CEP 014170-010, Brazil.
Salvador RassiMedical School, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Guilherme Veiga GuimarãesHeart Institute (InCor), São Paulo University Medical School (HC-FUMSP), Rua Dr Melo Alves 690, 4o andar, Bairro Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo, São Paulo, CEP 014170-010, Brazil.
Argentina, Chile, and Brazil SHIFT Investigators
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe SHIFT trial showed that ivabradine reduced heart rate (HR) and the risk of cardiovascular outcomes. Concerns remain over the efficacy and safety of ivabradine on heart failure (HF) due to Chagas disease (ChD). We therefore conducted a post hoc analysis of the SHIFT trial to investigate the effect of ivabradine in these patients. METHODS AND

resultsSHIFT was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in symptomatic systolic stable HF, HR ≥ 70 b.p.m., and in sinus rhythm. The ChD HF subgroup included 38 patients, 20 on ivabradine, and 18 on placebo. The ChD HF subgroup showed high prevalence of bundle branch right block and, compared with the overall SHIFT population, lower systolic blood pressure; higher use of diuretics, cardiac glycosides, and antialdosterone agents; and lower use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker or target daily dose of beta-blocker. ChD HF presented a poor prognosis (all-cause mortality at 2 years was ~60%). The mean twice-daily dose of ivabradine was 6.26 ± 1.15 mg and placebo 6.43 ± 1.55 mg. Ivabradine reduced HR from 77.9 ± 3.8 to 62.3 ± 10.1 b.p.m. (P = 0.005) and improved functional class (P = 0.02). A trend towards reduction in all-cause death was observed in ivabradine arm vs. placebo (P = 0.07). Ivabradine was not associated with serious bradycardia, atrioventricular block, hypotension, or syncope.

conclusionsChD HF is an advanced form of HF with poor prognosis. Ivabradine was effective in reducing HR in these patients and improving functional class. Although our results are based on a very limited sample and should be interpreted with caution, they suggest that ivabradine may have a favourable benefit-risk profile in ChD HF patients.

Indexed as

ArgentinaBrazilCardiovascular AgentsChagas DiseaseDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart Failure, SystolicHeart RateHumansIvabradineMaleMiddle AgedStroke VolumeCardiovascular AgentsIvabradineChagas diseaseChagasic cardiomyopathyHeart failureHeart rateIvabradineSHIFT trial

Identifiers

PMID29266804
PMCPMC5933959
OpenAlexW2777074561

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.