Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29275147›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of ophthalmology2018

Lack of Longitudinal Association Between Thiazolidinediones and Incidence and Progression of Diabetic Eye Disease: The ACCORD Eye Study.

Emily W Gower, James F Lovato, Walter T Ambrosius, Emily Y Chew, Ronald P Danis, Matthew D Davis, David C Goff, Craig M Greven, ACCORD Study Group

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Blood pressure control for diabetic retinopathy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Natural history of diabetic macular edema and factors predicting outcomes in sham-treated patients (MEAD study).Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2019
    Trial
  4. Effects of newer-generation anti-diabetics on diabetic retinopathy: a critical review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Current Treatments for Diabetic Macular Edema.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Diabetic macular edema: Evidence-based management.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Emily W GowerDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Department of Ophthalmology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Electronic address: egower@unc.edu.
James F LovatoDepartment of Biostatistical Sciences, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Walter T AmbrosiusDepartment of Biostatistical Sciences, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Emily Y ChewNational Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Ronald P DanisDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Matthew D DavisDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
David C GoffDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Craig M GrevenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
ACCORD Study Group
Wake Forest University · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USNational Eye Institute · US

Funding

PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN DIABETES MELLITUN01HC095183 · HC · MINNEAPOLIS MEDICAL RESEARCH FDN, INC. · PI GRIMM, RICHARD H · 1999 to 2000
$1.9M
PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN DIABETES MELLITUN01HC095181 · HC · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI THIBONNIER, MARC · 1999 to 2000
$1.8M
PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN DIABETES MELLITUN01HC095184 · HC · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BIGGER, J T · 1999 to 2000
$1.7M
PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN DIABETES MELLITUN01HC095182 · HC · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY · PI GOFF, DAVID C · 1999 to 2000
$1.6M
PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN DIABETES MELLITUS-N01HC95178N01HC095178 · HC · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BYINGTON, ROBERT · 1999 to 2006
$1.5M
PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN DIABETER MELLLITN01HC095180 · HC · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PROBSTFIELD, JEFFREY · 1999 to 2000
$1.5M
S-nitrosothiol analyzer for the clinical diagnosis of cardiovascular disease markR44HL095181 · NHLBI · ACCORD BIOMATERIALS, INC. · PI PISANO, MICHAEL R · 2010 to 2011
$1.4M
PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN DIABETES MELLITUN01HC095179 · HC · MCMASTER UNIVERSITY · PI GERSTEIN, HERTZEL C · 1999 to 2000
$1.3M
S-nitrosothiol analyzer for the clinical diagnosis of cardiovascular disease markR43HL095181 · NHLBI · ACCORD BIOMATERIALS, INC. · PI HANDA, HILTESH · 2009 to 2009
$93k
NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC095178NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC095179NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC095180NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC095181NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC095182NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC095183NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC095184NHLBI NIH HHS Y01 HC001010NHLBI NIH HHS Y01 HC009035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo report the longitudinal association between use of thiazolidinediones (TZDs), visual acuity (VA) change, and diabetic eye disease incidence and progression.

designCohort study ancillary to a randomized clinical trial.

methodsWe analyzed baseline and 4-year follow-up data of 2856 ACCORD trial participants with no history of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Based on stereoscopic fundus photographs, we evaluated diabetic macular edema (DME) progression and DR progression. We also evaluated 10- and 15-letter change on the ETDRS visual acuity chart. Main outcome measures were incidence or progression of DME or DR and change in visual acuity.

resultsTZD use was not associated with DME incidence in either the analysis of any use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] [95% CI]: 1.22 [0.72-2.05]) or duration of use (aOR: 1.02 [0.99-1.04]). Diabetic retinopathy (DR) incidence/progression was more common in patients with no or mild DR at baseline who were ever treated with TZDs (aOR: 1.68 [1.11-2.55]), but this association disappeared when adjusting for the time on TZD (aOR: 1.02 [1.00-1.04]). DR progression among those with moderate or worse DR at baseline was no different between TZD users and non-users. TZD usage had no effect on the ultimate visual acuity outcome.

conclusionIn this longitudinal study of patients with type 2 diabetes, we found no association between TZD use and visual acuity outcomes or DME progression, and no consistent evidence of increased DR progression in patients ever treated with TZDs vs those never treated with TZDs.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic RetinopathyDisease ProgressionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesMacular EdemaMaleMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHypoglycemic AgentsThiazolidinediones

Identifiers

PMID29275147
PMCPMC6381823
OpenAlexW2780173110

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.