Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29277407›Full record

ReviewPreventive medicine2018

Skin cancer interventions across the cancer control continuum: Review of technology, environment, and theory.

Jennifer M Taber, Barbra A Dickerman, Jean-Phillip Okhovat, Alan C Geller, Laura A Dwyer, Anne M Hartman, Frank M Perna

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Preventive medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Application of the Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) in Teaching Skin Cancer Prevention Behaviors in Male Students.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Healthy Behaviors: Prevalence of Uptake Among Cancer Survivors.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Public policies, State and prevention of skin cancer related to occupational exposure: an integrative review.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer M TaberBehavioral Research Program, National Cancer Institute, United States. Electronic address: jtaber1@kent.edu.
Barbra A DickermanHarvard TH Chan School of Public Health, United States.
Jean-Phillip OkhovatHarvard TH Chan School of Public Health, United States.
Alan C GellerHarvard TH Chan School of Public Health, United States.
Laura A DwyerCape Fox Facilities Services, United States.
Anne M HartmanBehavioral Research Program, National Cancer Institute, United States.
Frank M PernaBehavioral Research Program, National Cancer Institute, United States.
Harvard University · USNational Cancer Institute · USNational Cancer Institute · MY

Funding

Training Program in Cancer EpidemiologyT32CA009001 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI A. Heather Eliassen, Meir Stampfer · 1985 to 2026
$17.3M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Cancer Institute's Skin Cancer Intervention across the Cancer Control Continuum model was developed to summarize research and identify gaps concerning skin cancer interventions. We conducted a mapping review to characterize whether behavioral interventions addressing skin cancer prevention and control from 2000 to 2015 included (1) technology, (2) environmental manipulations (policy and/or built environment), and (3) a theoretical basis. We included 86 studies with a randomized controlled or quasi-experimental design that targeted behavioral intervention in skin cancer for children and/or adults; seven of these were dissemination or implementation studies. Of the interventions described in the remaining 79 articles, 57 promoted only prevention behaviors (e.g., ultraviolet radiation protection), five promoted only detection (e.g., skin examinations), 10 promoted both prevention and detection, and seven focused on survivorship. Of the 79 non-dissemination studies, two-thirds used some type of technology (n=52; 65.8%). Technology specific to skin cancer was infrequently used: UVR photography was used in 15.2% of studies (n=12), reflectance spectroscopy was used in 12.7% (n=10), and dermatoscopes (n=1) and dosimeters (n=2) were each used in less than 3%. Ten studies (12.7%) targeted the built environment. Fifty-two (65.8%) of the studies included theory-based interventions. The most common theories were Social Cognitive Theory (n=20; 25.3%), Health Belief Model (n=17; 21.5%), and the Theory of Planned Behavior/Reasoned Action (n=12; 15.2%). Results suggest that skin cancer specific technology and environmental manipulations are underutilized in skin cancer behavioral interventions. We discuss implications of these results for researchers developing skin cancer behavioral interventions.

Indexed as

Built EnvironmentHealth BehaviorSocial TheoryTechnologyHumansSkin NeoplasmsUltraviolet RaysBehaviorCancer controlCancer control continuumDetectionEnvironmentInterventionPreventionReviewScreeningSkin cancerTechnologyTheory

Identifiers

PMID29277407
PMCPMC5949070
OpenAlexW2778909237

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.