Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29281997›Full record

SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2017

Meta-analysis of the safety of voriconazole in definitive, empirical, and prophylactic therapies for invasive fungal infections.

Yuanming Xing, Lu Chen, Yan Feng, Yan Zhou, Yajing Zhai, Jun Lu

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Scedosporium Apiospermum: A Rare Cause of Necrotizing Otitis Externa. Our Experience and A Review of the Current Literature.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Emerging Antifungal Targets and Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Combat trauma-related invasive fungal wound infections.Current fungal infection reports · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuanming XingClinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Lu ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Yan FengClinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Yan ZhouClinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Yajing ZhaiClinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Jun LuClinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China. 2576042020@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVoriconazole has been used in the treatment and prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) while its wide use was limited by some frequent adverse events, especially neurotoxicity, hepatotoxicity and even renal disruption. The aim of this study was to comprehensively compare voriconazole-induced toxicity, including tolerability, neurotoxicity, visual toxicity, hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity with the composite of other antifungals commonly used in clinic.

methodsBibliography databases were searched to select randomized controlled trials providing information about the incidence of toxicity referred above. A total of 4122 patients from 16 studies were included in the meta-analysis.

resultsAnalysis of individual types of toxicity showed that there was a significant difference between voriconazole and the composite of other antifungal agents. The primary outcome, the tolerability of voriconazole was slightly inferior (OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.21-2.40, P = 0.002) and it is noteworthy that the probabilities of neurotoxicity and visual toxicity were around twice higher and six-fold for voriconazole compared with the counterpart (OR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.05-3.75, P = 0.03 and OR = 6.50, 95% CI = 2.93-14.41, P < 0.00001, respectively). Hepatotoxicity was more common in voriconazole group (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.17-2.19, P = 0.003) whereas its pooled risk of nephrotoxicity was about half of the composite of other five antifungal agents (OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.26-0.84, P = 0.01).

conclusionOur analysis has revealed differences in multiple types of toxicity induced by VRC versus other antifungals and quantified the corresponding pooled risks, which could provide an alternative for patients with a certain antifungal intolerance and help the clinician to select the optimal intervention.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsDatabases, FactualDrug ToleranceHumansInvasive Fungal InfectionsKidney DiseasesLiver DiseasesOdds RatioVoriconazoleAntifungal AgentsVoriconazoleInvasive fungal infectionsMeta-analysisTolerabilityVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID29281997
PMCPMC5745890

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.