Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29292156›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology advances

In vitro methods for testing antiviral drugs.

Michaela Rumlová, Tomáš Ruml

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. In Vitro Model to Test Therapeutic Agents Against Rhinovirus Infection.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Antiviral and Antibacterial Effect of Honey Enriched withMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michaela RumlováDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague 166 28, Czech Republic. Electronic address: michaela.rumlova@vscht.cz.
Tomáš RumlDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague 166 28, Czech Republic. Electronic address: tomas.ruml@vscht.cz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite successful vaccination programs and effective treatments for some viral infections, humans are still losing the battle with viruses. Persisting human pandemics, emerging and re-emerging viruses, and evolution of drug-resistant strains impose continuous search for new antiviral drugs. A combination of detailed information about the molecular organization of viruses and progress in molecular biology and computer technologies has enabled rational antivirals design. Initial step in establishing efficacy of new antivirals is based on simple methods assessing inhibition of the intended target. We provide here an overview of biochemical and cell-based assays evaluating the activity of inhibitors of clinically important viruses.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiviral AgentsCapsidDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEnzyme InhibitorsHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansVirus InternalizationVirus Physiological PhenomenaVirus ReplicationAntiviral AgentsEnzyme InhibitorsAssayAssemblyCell-basedEntryHigh-throughput screeningInhibitorIn vitroMethodReplicationVirus

Identifiers

PMID29292156
PMCPMC7127693

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.