Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29304208›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2018

What has changed in the treatment of invasive candidiasis? A look at the past 10 years and ahead.

Matteo Bassetti, Elda Righi, Philippe Montravers, Oliver A Cornely

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Antifungal and anti-biofilm effects of hydrazone derivatives onJournal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Microbiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Mortality-associated factors of candidemia: a multi-center prospective cohort in Turkey.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2022
    Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Blood Stream Infections from MDR Bacteria.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Renal CD169Life science alliance · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Matteo BassettiInfectious Diseases Clinic, Department of Medicine University of Udine and Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata, Presidio Ospedaliero Universitario Santa Maria della Misericordia, Udine, Italy.
Elda RighiInfectious Diseases Clinic, Department of Medicine University of Udine and Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata, Presidio Ospedaliero Universitario Santa Maria della Misericordia, Udine, Italy.
Philippe MontraversParis Diderot Sorbonne Cite University, and Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, HUPNSV, AP-HP, INSERM UMR 1152, Paris, France.
Oliver A CornelyCologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Department I of Internal Medicine, Clinical Trials Centre Cologne (ZKS Köln), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging Associated Diseases · DEOspedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine · ITPresidio Ospedaliero · ITUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG)UM1AI104681 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Vance G. Fowler, Henry F HENRY CHAMBERS · 2013 to 2026
$180.8M
NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI104681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of invasive candidiasis has changed greatly in the past decade and must continue to evolve if we are to improve outcomes in this serious infection. A review of recent history may provide insights for the future. The morbidity and mortality of invasive candidiasis remain difficult to measure despite an obvious clinical burden. Current treatment guidelines now recommend echinocandins as first-line empirical treatment, with fluconazole as an acceptable alternative for selected patients, reflecting the efficacy demonstrated by echinocandins and increasing resistance observed with fluconazole. The selection of antifungal therapy now must consider not only resistance but also the shift in predominance from Candida albicans to non-albicans species, notably Candida glabrata. The recent emergence of Candida auris has been met with great interest, although the longer-term implications of this phenomenon remain unclear. The broad goal of treatment continues to be administration of safe, efficacious antifungal therapy as soon as possible. Diagnostic methods beyond traditional blood culture present an opportunity to shorten the time to an accurate diagnosis, and earlier treatment initiation based on prophylactic and empirical or pre-emptive strategies seeks to ensure timely therapeutic intervention. In addition, there are novel agents in the antifungal pipeline. These developments, as well as ongoing studies of dosing, toxicity and resistance development, are important items on the current research agenda and may play a role in future changes to the treatment of invasive candidiasis.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementAntifungal AgentsCandidaCandidiasis, InvasiveDiagnostic Tests, RoutineDrug Resistance, FungalDrug TherapyEchinocandinsFluconazoleHumansAntifungal AgentsEchinocandinsFluconazole

Identifiers

PMID29304208
PMCPMC5890781
OpenAlexW2781712060

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.