Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29323367›Full record

ArticleThe Analyst2018

Quantitative mass spectrometry imaging of glutathione in healthy and cancerous hen ovarian tissue sections by infrared matrix-assisted laser desorption electrospray ionization (IR-MALDESI).

Milad Nazari, Mark T Bokhart, Philip L Loziuk, David C Muddiman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Analyst, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Oversampling for Enhanced Spatial Resolution of Zebrafish by Top-Hat IR-MALDESI-MSI.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Quantitative mass spectrometry imaging (qMSI): A tutorial.Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Milad NazariDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Education, Technology, and Research Innovation Center (METRIC), North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA. david_muddiman@ncsu.edu.
Mark T BokhartDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Education, Technology, and Research Innovation Center (METRIC), North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA. david_muddiman@ncsu.edu.
Philip L LoziukDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Education, Technology, and Research Innovation Center (METRIC), North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA. david_muddiman@ncsu.edu.
David C MuddimanDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Education, Technology, and Research Innovation Center (METRIC), North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA. david_muddiman@ncsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2216-499X

Funding

Development and Application of New Ionization Methods for Biological Mass SpectrometryR01GM087964 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI MUDDIMAN, DAVID C. · 2010 to 2025
$4.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A quantitative mass spectrometry imaging (QMSI) method for absolute quantification of glutathione (GSH) in healthy and cancerous hen ovarian tissues using infrared matrix-assisted laser desorption electrospray ionization (IR-MALDESI) is presented. Using this technique, the ion abundance of GSH was normalized to that of a structural analogue, which was sprayed on the slide prior to mounting the tissue sections. This normalization strategy significantly improved the voxel-to-voxel variability; the variability is attributed to the overall ionization process. Subsequently, a series of calibration spots of stable isotope-labeled (SIL) GSH were pipetted on top of the tissue to construct a spatial calibration curve, and calculate the concentration of GSH in both tissue sections. The QMSI results were verified by LC-MS/MS quantification of GSH for the same tissues. GSH was extracted from tissue sections in a slightly acidic buffer and was then alkylated using N-ethylmaleimide to minimize autoxidation of GSH to glutathione disulfide. The alkylated GSH was separated from other contaminants using reversed phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) coupled to a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, and the z-ion transition of NEM-GSH was used to quantify GSH in each tissue section. While the absolute values obtained using IR-MALDESI QMSI and LC-MS/MS were different, a ∼2-fold increase in the concentration of GSH in cancer tissue compared to the healthy tissue was observed using both techniques. Possible reasons for the difference between absolute concentration values obtained using IR-MALDESI QMSI and LC-MS/MS are also discussed.

Indexed as

Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationAnimalsChickensChromatography, LiquidFemaleGlutathioneOvarian NeoplasmsOvaryTandem Mass SpectrometryGlutathione

Identifiers

PMID29323367
PMCPMC5788707

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.