Trial reportHaematologica2018
A phase II study of the oral JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in advanced relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma.
Trial report in Haematologica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ruxolitinib shows activity against Hodgkin lymphoma but not primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma.BMC cancer · 2019Trial
- Next-generation Janus kinase inhibitors: Integrating synthetic innovation, structural biology, and computational design for precision drug discovery.Pharmaceutical science advances · 2026Review
- Beyond suppression: the paradox of JAK inhibitors as amplifiers of cancer immunotherapy.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026Review
- JAK-STAT Signaling in Autoimmunity and Cancer.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2025Review
- JAK inhibition enhances checkpoint blockade immunotherapy in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Review
- Protein kinase CK2α is overexpressed in classical hodgkin lymphoma, regulates key signaling pathways, PD-L1 and may represent a new target for therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Optimizing Treatment for Relapsed/Refractory Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma in the Era of Immunotherapy.Cancers · 2023Review
- JAK/STAT blockade reverses the malignant phenotype of Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cells.Blood advances · 2023Article
- Advances in the treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma (Review).International journal of oncology · 2023Review
- Vitiligo and Mental Health: Natural Compounds' Usefulness.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Incorporation of Ruxolitinib in the Management of Refractory/Relapsed Hodgkin Lymphoma: Where Do We Stand?Clinical hematology international · 2023Review
- Article
- Review
- Promising drugs and treatment options for pediatric and adolescent patients with Hodgkin lymphoma.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Review
- Untwining Anti-Tumor and Immunosuppressive Effects of JAK Inhibitors-A Strategy for Hematological Malignancies?Cancers · 2021Review
- Pharmacological Effects of Polyphenol Phytochemicals on the JAK-STAT Signaling Pathway.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Inside Perspective of the Synthetic and Computational Toolbox of JAK Inhibitors: Recent Updates.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Treatment of Hodgkin Lymphoma Relapsed after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
JAK2 constitutive activation/overexpression is common in classical Hodgkin lymphoma, and several cytokines stimulate Hodgkin lymphoma cells by recognizing JAK1-/JAK2-bound receptors. JAK blockade may thus be therapeutically beneficial in Hodgkin lymphoma. In this phase II study we assessed the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib, an oral JAK1/2 inhibitor, in patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. The primary objective was overall response rate according to the International Harmonization Project 2007 criteria. Thirty-three patients with advanced disease (median number of prior lines of treatment: 5; refractory: 82%) were included; nine (27.3%) received at least six cycles of ruxolitinib and six (18.2%) received more than six cycles. The overall response rate after six cycles was 9.4% (3/32 patients). All three responders had partial responses; another 11 patients had transient stable disease. Best overall response rate was 18.8% (6/32 patients). Rapid alleviation of B-symptoms was common. The median duration of response was 7.7 months, median progression-free survival 3.5 months (95% CI: 1.9-4.6), and the median overall survival 27.1 months (95% CI: 14.4-27.1). Forty adverse events were reported in 14/33 patients (42.4%). One event led to treatment discontinuation, while 87.5% of patients recovered without sequelae. Twenty-five adverse events were grade 3 or higher. These events were mostly anemia (n=11), all considered related to ruxolitinib. Other main causes of grade 3 or higher adverse events included lymphopenia and infections. Of note, no cases of grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia were observed. Ruxolitinib shows signs of activity, albeit short-lived, beyond a simple anti-inflammatory effect. Its limited toxicity suggests that it has the potential to be combined with other therapeutic modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.