Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29355435›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes technology & therapeutics2018

Anti-Insulin Antibodies and Adverse Events with Biosimilar Insulin Lispro Compared with Humalog Insulin Lispro in People with Diabetes.

Philip Home, Karl-Michael Derwahl, Monika Ziemen, Karin Wernicke-Panten, Suzanne Pierre, Yvonne Kirchhein, Satish K Garg

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Biosimilar insulin concepts.Journal of diabetes · 2022
    Article
  13. Analysis of the Outcomes of 73 Patients with Exogenous Positive Insulin Anti-Body.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Philip Home1 Institute for Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom .
Karl-Michael Derwahl2 Institut für Klinische Forschung und Entwicklung (IKFE) , Berlin, Germany .
Monika Ziemen3 Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland, Frankfurt, Germany .
Karin Wernicke-Panten3 Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland, Frankfurt, Germany .
Suzanne Pierre4 Sanofi, Paris, France .
Yvonne Kirchhein3 Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland, Frankfurt, Germany .
Satish K Garg5 Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver , Aurora, Colorado.
Sanofi (Germany) · DENewcastle University · GBSanofi (France) · FRUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSAR342434 (SAR-Lis) is a biosimilar (follow-on) of insulin lispro (Humalog

methodsAIA were measured regularly throughout both studies at a centralized laboratory blinded to treatment groups using a drug-specific AIA assay. The AIA status (positive or negative), AIA titers, and cross-reactivity to human insulin, insulin glargine, and insulin glargine metabolite M1 were analyzed. The potential effect of AIA on safety, particularly as related to hypersensitivity reactions, hypoglycemia, and treatment-emergent adverse events, as well as on glycemic control (HbA

resultsAIA positive status at baseline was similar for the two insulins, but higher in T1DM than in T2DM. In both studies, the percentage of people newly developing AIA in the two treatment groups, or having a ≥4-fold increase in AIA titers, did not differ. No relationship was observed between maximum individual AIA titers and change in HbA

conclusionInsulin lispro SAR342434 and the originator insulin lispro had a similar immunogenicity profile in people with T1DM or T2DM.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansInsulin AntibodiesInsulin LisproMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinInsulin AntibodiesInsulin LisproSAR342434Anti-insulin antibodiesBiosimilarImmunogenicityInsulin lisproSAR342434

Identifiers

PMID29355435
PMCPMC5771536
OpenAlexW2785389980

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.