Advancing the science of patient decision aids through reporting guidelines.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Are We Improving? Update and Critical Appraisal of the Reporting of Decision Process and Quality Measures in Trials Evaluating Patient Decision Aids.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2021
   Pooled it
2. Defining the strategies to advance health-literacy-friendly patient decision aids based on the ICA-NRM approach.BMC health services research · 2025
   Article
3. Patient engagement partnerships in clinical trials (PEP-CT): protocol for the systematic development and testing of patient partner and investigator decision aids.BMJ open · 2022
   Article
4. The International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration: Evidence Update 2.0.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2021
   Article
5. Effectiveness of patient decision aids in women considering psychotropic medication use during pregnancy: a literature review.Archives of women's mental health · 2021
   Review
6. Patient Engagement Partnerships in Clinical Trials: Development of Patient Partner and Investigator Decision Aids.The patient · 2020
   Article
7. User-centered development of a hypospadias decision aid prototype.Journal of pediatric urology · 2020
   Article
8. Factors Influencing the Adoption of a Patient Decision Aid Development Platform: A Qualitative Study.MDM policy & practice
   Article
9. Time for More Support? Stakeholder Engagement for a Long-Term Care Planning Dementia Decision Aid Prototype.Gerontology & geriatric medicine
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluation studies: the development of SUNDAE Checklist.2018
• Comment on
  Explanation and elaboration of the Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluations (SUNDAE) guidelines: examples of reporting SUNDAE items from patient decision aid evaluation literature.2018

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as