Trial reportPain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2018
A Phase I, Randomized, Double-Blind, Laser-Evoked Potential Study to Evaluate the Analgesic/Antihyperalgesic Effect of ASP9226, a State-Dependent N-Type Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel Inhibitor, in Healthy Male Subjects.
Trial report in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Membrane Stabilizer Medications in the Treatment of Chronic Neuropathic Pain: a Comprehensive Review.Current pain and headache reports · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Evaluate the analgesic/antihyperalgesic effects of ASP9226, a state-dependent N-type voltage-gated calcium channel inhibitor, in healthy male subjects. Design: Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo- and active comparator-controlled crossover study. Setting: HPR Dr. Schaffler GmbH, Munich, Germany. Subject: Healthy male subjects aged 18-55 years. Methods: Twenty-four eligible subjects were randomly assigned to one of four treatment sequences and received single doses of ASP9226 (30 mg or 50 mg), pregabalin (150 mg), or placebo during four treatment periods. Laser-evoked potentials (LEP) and postlaser pain visual analog scales (VAS) on capsaicin-treated skin were assessed during main assessment days (the first day of each study period). Primary and secondary end points were the differences in LEP N2-P2 peak-to-peak (PtP) amplitudes and VAS score, respectively, in all subjects. Results: Overall, treatment with pregabalin resulted in a significantly lower LEP N2-P2 PtP amplitude vs placebo (-3.30 μV, P < 0.0001). There were no clinically relevant differences in N2-P2 PtP amplitudes between placebo and either ASP9226 dose (-0.31 μV and -0.27 μV). Furthermore, subjects reported significantly lower VAS pain scores with pregabalin vs placebo (-9.90%, P < 0.0001) in contrast to ASP9226 30 mg (-2.1%) and ASP9226 50 mg (1.2%) vs placebo. Subgroup analysis of LEP and VAS pain in participants with positive prestudy capsaicin response (n = 13) were in keeping with results in all subjects. Conclusions: ASP9226 was well tolerated; however, there was no improvement in LEP and VAS pain scores with ASP9226 at either dose vs placebo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.