ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2018
Preferences for learning different types of genome sequencing results among young breast cancer patients: Role of psychological and clinical factors.
Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review of preferences for additional findings from genomic testing.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Pooled it
- Patient perspectives on testing for clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential.Blood advances · 2022Trial
- The impact of the number of tests presented and a provider recommendation on decisions about genetic testing for cancer risk.Patient education and counseling · 2021Trial
- A hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial to integrate precision skin cancer risk feedback in federally qualified health centers.Contemporary clinical trials · 2026Article
- Understanding patient perspectives on breast cancer risk: a qualitative study to inform genetic testing communication in the primary care setting.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Associations between subjective social status and predictors of interest in genetic testing among women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Article
- Understanding communication between patients and healthcare professionals regarding comprehensive biomarker testing in precision oncology: A scoping review.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Investigation of interest in and timing preference for cancer predisposition testing and expanded carrier screening among women of reproductive age.PEC innovation · 2023Article
- Ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) and challenges in the design of a randomized controlled trial to test the online return of cancer genetic research results to U.S. Black women.Contemporary clinical trials · 2023Article
- Great expectations: patients' preferences for clinically significant results from genomic sequencing.Human genetics · 2023Article
- Women's thoughts on receiving and sharing genetic information: Considerations for genetic counseling.Journal of genetic counseling · 2022Article
- Preferences for return of germline genome sequencing results for cancer patients and their genetic relatives in a research setting.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2022Article
- Public interest in unexpected genomic findings: a survey study identifying aspects of sequencing attitudes that influence preferences.Journal of community genetics · 2022Article
- Landscape of germline cancer predisposition mutations testing and management in pediatrics: Implications for research and clinical care.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- Interest in Cancer Predisposition Testing and Carrier Screening Offered as Part of Routine Healthcare Among an Ethnically Diverse Sample of Young Women.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- A scoping review of social and behavioral science research to translate genomic discoveries into population health impact.Translational behavioral medicine · 2021Article
- Impact of numeracy preferences on information needs for genome sequencing results.Patient education and counseling · 2021Article
- A primer in genomics for social and behavioral investigators.Translational behavioral medicine · 2020Article
- Comparing preferences for return of genome sequencing results assessed with rating and ranking items.Journal of genetic counseling · 2020Article
- In Different Voices: The Views of People with Disabilities about Return of Results from Precision Medicine Research.Public health genomics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growing importance of genome sequencing means that patients will increasingly face decisions regarding what results they would like to learn. The present study examined psychological and clinical factors that might affect these preferences. 1,080 women diagnosed with breast cancer at age 40 or younger completed an online survey. We assessed their interest in learning various types of genome sequencing results: risk of preventable disease or unpreventable disease, cancer treatment response, uncertain meaning, risk to relatives' health, and ancestry/physical traits. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine whether being "very" interested in each result type was associated with clinical factors: BRCA1/2 mutation status, prior genetic testing, family history of breast cancer, and psychological factors: cancer recurrence worry, genetic risk worry, future orientation, health information orientation, and genome sequencing knowledge. The proportion of respondents who were very interested in learning each type of result ranged from 16% to 77%. In all multivariable models, those who were very interested in learning a result type had significantly higher knowledge about sequencing benefits, greater genetic risks worry, and stronger health information orientation compared to those with less interest (p-values < .05). Our findings indicate that high interest in return of various types of genome sequencing results was more closely related to psychological factors. Shared decision-making approaches that increase knowledge about genome sequencing and incorporate patient preferences for health information and learning about genetic risks may help support patients' informed choices about learning different types of sequencing results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.