Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29394380›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2018

The mechanisms of a mammalian splicing enhancer.

Andrew M Jobbins, Linus F Reichenbach, Christian M Lucas, Andrew J Hudson, Glenn A Burley, Ian C Eperon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Imaging Organization of RNA Processing within the Nucleus.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew M JobbinsLeicester Institute of Structural & Chemical Biology and Department of Molecular & Cell Biology, University of Leicester, UK.
Linus F ReichenbachDepartment of Pure and Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, UK.
Christian M LucasLeicester Institute of Structural & Chemical Biology and Department of Molecular & Cell Biology, University of Leicester, UK.
Andrew J HudsonLeicester Institute of Structural & Chemical Biology and Department of Chemistry, University of Leicester, UK.
Glenn A BurleyDepartment of Pure and Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, UK.
Ian C EperonLeicester Institute of Structural & Chemical Biology and Department of Molecular & Cell Biology, University of Leicester, UK.
University of Leicester · GBUniversity of Strathclyde · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exonic splicing enhancer (ESE) sequences are bound by serine & arginine-rich (SR) proteins, which in turn enhance the recruitment of splicing factors. It was inferred from measurements of splicing around twenty years ago that Drosophila doublesex ESEs are bound stably by SR proteins, and that the bound proteins interact directly but with low probability with their targets. However, it has not been possible with conventional methods to demonstrate whether mammalian ESEs behave likewise. Using single molecule multi-colour colocalization methods to study SRSF1-dependent ESEs, we have found that that the proportion of RNA molecules bound by SRSF1 increases with the number of ESE repeats, but only a single molecule of SRSF1 is bound. We conclude that initial interactions between SRSF1 and an ESE are weak and transient, and that these limit the activity of a mammalian ESE. We tested whether the activation step involves the propagation of proteins along the RNA or direct interactions with 3' splice site components by inserting hexaethylene glycol or abasic RNA between the ESE and the target 3' splice site. These insertions did not block activation, and we conclude that the activation step involves direct interactions. These results support a model in which regulatory proteins bind transiently and in dynamic competition, with the result that each ESE in an exon contributes independently to the probability that an activator protein is bound and in close proximity to a splice site.

Indexed as

RNA SplicingAnimalsEnhancer Elements, GeneticExonsHeLa CellsHumansLuminescent ProteinsMicroscopy, FluorescenceProtein BindingRNARNA PrecursorsRNA Splice SitesSerine-Arginine Splicing FactorsTranscription FactorsLuminescent ProteinsRNARNA PrecursorsRNA Splice SitesSerine-Arginine Splicing FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID29394380
PMCPMC5861446
OpenAlexW2785743033

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.