Evidence mapPaperPMID 29396374Full record

Trial reportMolecular metabolism2018

Efficacy of vildagliptin for prevention of postpartum diabetes in women with a recent history of insulin-requiring gestational diabetes: A phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Sandra Hummel, Andreas Beyerlein, Markus Pfirrmann, Anna Hofelich, Daniela Much, Susanne Hivner, Melanie Bunk, Melanie Herbst, Claudia Peplow, Markus Walter and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Molecular metabolism, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01018602 (A Phase II, Randomized, Double-blind, 2-arm Controlled Study to Evaluate Efficacy of the DPPIV-inhibitor Vildagliptin for Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes in Women With a Recent History of Insulin-requiring Gestational Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01018602 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

A Phase II, Randomized, Double-blind, 2-arm Controlled Study to Evaluate Efficacy of the DPPIV-inhibitor Vildagliptin for Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes in Women With a Recent History of Insulin-requiring Gestational Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut fur Diabetesforschung, Munich, GermanyRan2008 to 2015Enrolled140ConditionsInsulin-dependent Gestational DiabetesArmsvildagliptin, inactive pill
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Incretins as a Potential Treatment Option for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra HummelForschergruppe Diabetes e.V. am Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; Institute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, and Forschergruppe Diabetes, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Andreas BeyerleinInstitute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, and Forschergruppe Diabetes, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Markus PfirrmannInstitut für Medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie (IBE), Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 München, Germany.
Anna HofelichForschergruppe Diabetes e.V. am Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; Institute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, and Forschergruppe Diabetes, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Daniela MuchForschergruppe Diabetes e.V. am Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; Institute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, and Forschergruppe Diabetes, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Susanne HivnerForschergruppe Diabetes e.V. am Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; Institute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, and Forschergruppe Diabetes, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Melanie BunkForschergruppe Diabetes e.V. am Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Melanie HerbstForschergruppe Diabetes e.V. am Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Claudia PeplowForschergruppe Diabetes e.V. am Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; Institute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, and Forschergruppe Diabetes, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Markus WalterForschergruppe Diabetes e.V. am Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Denise KohnInstitut für Medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie (IBE), Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 München, Germany.
Nadine HummelInstitute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, and Forschergruppe Diabetes, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Jürgen KratzschInstitut für Laboratoriumsmedizin, Klinische Chemie und Molekulare Diagnostik, Uniklinikum Leipzig, Paul-List-Str. 13/15, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Michael HummelForschergruppe Diabetes e.V. am Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Martin FüchtenbuschForschergruppe Diabetes e.V. am Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Joerg HasfordInstitut für Medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie (IBE), Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 München, Germany.
Anette-G ZieglerForschergruppe Diabetes e.V. am Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; Institute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, and Forschergruppe Diabetes, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany. Electronic address: anette-g.ziegler@helmholtz-muenchen.de.
PINGUIN Study Group
TUM Klinikum · DEHelmholtz Zentrum München · DEZimmer Biomet (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWomen with insulin-requiring gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are at high risk of developing diabetes within a few years postpartum. We implemented this phase II study to test the hypothesis that vildagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, is superior to placebo in terms of reducing the risk of postpartum diabetes.

methodsWomen with insulin-requiring GDM were randomized to either placebo or 50 mg vildagliptin twice daily for 24 months followed by a 12-month observation period (EudraCT: 2007-000634-39). Both groups received lifestyle counseling. The primary efficacy outcomes were the diagnosis of diabetes (American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria) or impaired fasting glucose (IFG)/impaired glucose tolerance (IGT).

resultsBetween 2008 and 2015, 113 patients (58 vildagliptin, 55 placebo) were randomized within 2.2-10.4 (median 8.6) months after delivery. At the interim analysis, nine diabetic events and 28 IFG/IGT events had occurred. Fifty-two women withdrew before completing the treatment phase. Because of the low diabetes rate, the study was terminated. Lifestyle adherence was similar in both groups. At 24 months, the cumulative probability of postpartum diabetes was 3% and 5% (hazard ratio: 1.03; 95% confidence interval: 0.15-7.36) and IFG/IGT was 43% and 22% (hazard ratio: 0.55; 95% confidence interval: 0.26-1.19) in the placebo and vildagliptin groups, respectively. Vildagliptin was well tolerated with no unexpected adverse events.

conclusionsThe study did not show significant superiority of vildagliptin over placebo in terms of reducing the risk of postpartum diabetes. However, treatment was safe and suggested some improvements in glycemic control, insulin resistance, and β-cell function. The study identified critical issues in performing clinical trials in the early postpartum period in women with GDM hampering efficacy assessments. With this knowledge, we have set a basis for which properly powered trials could be performed in women with recent GDM. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AT CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01018602.

Indexed as

AdultDiabetes, GestationalDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsPostpartum PeriodPregnancyVildagliptinHypoglycemic AgentsVildagliptinDipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitorGestational diabetes mellitusLife-stylePostpartum diabetesPreventionRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID29396374
PMCPMC5869734
OpenAlexW2781866739

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.