ReviewBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging2018
Using Event-Related Potentials and Startle to Evaluate Time Course in Anxiety and Depression.
Review in Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncovering putative neural mechanisms of neurotherapeutic impacts on EEG using the Human Neocortical Neurosolver.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Beyond classical metrics: Generalizability theory across psychophysiological modalities.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2026Review
- Neurophysiological Signatures of Major Depressive Disorder and Frontocentral Gamma Auditory Response Deficits.Depression and anxiety · 2025Article
- Mood and anxiety disorders within the Research Domain Criteria framework of Positive and Negative Valence Systems: a scoping review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- The Neural Correlates of the Recognition of Emotional Intensity Deficits in Major Depression: An ERP Study.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2023Article
- A biomarker discovery framework for childhood anxiety.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- A cross-sectional study exploring the relationship between symptoms of anxiety/depression and P50 sensory gating in adult patients diagnosed with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Associations Between Repetitive Negative Thinking and Habituation of Defensive Responding Within and Between Sessions.Affective science · 2022Article
- Using what we know about threat reactivity models to understand mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic.Behaviour research and therapy · 2022Article
- Cannabis users demonstrate enhanced neural reactivity to reward: An event-related potential and time-frequency EEG study.Addictive behaviors · 2021Article
- The time course of responding to aversiveness in females with a history of non-suicidal self-injury.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria initiative is a research framework designed toward understanding psychopathology as abnormalities of dimensional neurobehavioral constructs rather than in terms of DSM-defined categories. Research Domain Criteria constructs within the negative valence domain are particularly relevant for understanding anxiety and depressive disorders, which are pervasive, debilitating, and characterized by negative processing bias. One important direction for Research Domain Criteria research is investigating processes and parameters related to the time course (or chronometry) of negative valenced constructs. Two reliable methods for assessing chronometry are event-related potentials (ERPs) and startle blink. In this qualitative review, we examine ERP and startle studies of individuals with anxiety or depression or individuals vulnerable to affective disorders. The aim of the review is to highlight how these methods can inform the role of chronometry in the spectrum of anxiety and depression. ERP studies examining different chronometry facets of negative valenced responses have shown that transdiagnostic groups of individuals with internalizing psychopathologies exhibit abnormalities at early stages of processing. Startle reactivity studies have robustly differentiated fear-based disorders (e.g., panic disorder, social phobia) from other anxiety disorders (e.g., generalized anxiety disorder) and have also shown that different internalizing phenotypes exhibit different patterns of habituation. Findings lend support to the value of ERP and startle measures in identifying groups that cut across conventional classification systems. We also highlight methodological issues that can aid in the validity and reproducibility of ERP and startle findings and, ultimately, in the goal of developing more precise models of anxiety and depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.