ArticleLife sciences, society and policy2018
How medical technologies shape the experience of illness.
Article in Life sciences, society and policy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceptions of the use of smartwatches for the early detection of cardiac arrhythmias in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Hope and hopelessness in the face of ovarian cancer: perspectives from gynecologists.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Looking back at resignation syndrome: the rise and fall of a culture-bound endemic.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2025Article
- Conceptual scaffolding for the philosophy of medicine.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2025Article
- "My Biomarkers Are Fine, Thank You": On the Biomarkerization of Modern Medicine.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- The Phenomenology of Objectification in and Through Medical Practice and Technology Development.The Journal of medicine and philosophy · 2023Article
- Enablers and barriers to evidence implementation in complementary medicine: A systematic review.Integrative medicine research · 2022Review
- The Patient Perspective of Telemedicine in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic.Bulletin of science, technology & society · 2022Article
- "It's no good but at least I've always got it round my neck": A postphenomenological analysis of reassurance in assistive technology use by older people.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2022Article
- In their own words: A narrative analysis of illness memoirs written by men with prostate cancer.Sociology of health & illness · 2022Article
- The ethical challenges facing the widespread adoption of digital healthcare technology.Health and technology · 2022Article
- Teasing out Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: An Ethical Critique of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Medicine.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2021Article
- Innovative Medical Technology and the Treatment Decision-Making Process in Multiple Sclerosis: A Focus Group Study to Examine Patient Perspectives.Patient preference and adherence · 2021Article
- Experiencing objectified health: turning the body into an object of attention.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2020Article
- Uncertainty and certain death: the role of clinical trials in terminal cancer care.Sociology of health & illness · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this article we explore how diagnostic and therapeutic technologies shape the lived experiences of illness for patients. By analysing a wide range of examples, we identify six ways that technology can (trans)form the experience of illness (and health). First, technology may create awareness of disease by revealing asymptomatic signs or markers (imaging techniques, blood tests). Second, the technology can reveal risk factors for developing diseases (e.g., high blood pressure or genetic tests that reveal risks of falling ill in the future). Third, the technology can affect and change an already present illness experience (e.g., the way blood sugar measurement affects the perceived symptoms of diabetes). Fourth, therapeutic technologies may redefine our experiences of a certain condition as diseased rather than unfortunate (e.g. assisted reproductive technologies or symptom based diagnoses in psychiatry). Fifth, technology influences illness experiences through altering social-cultural norms and values regarding various diagnoses. Sixth, technology influences and changes our experiences of being healthy in contrast and relation to being diseased and ill. This typology of how technology forms illness and related conditions calls for reflection regarding the phenomenology of technology and health. How are medical technologies and their outcomes perceived and understood by patients? The phenomenological way of approaching illness as a lived, bodily being-in-the-world is an important approach for better understanding and evaluating the effects that medical technologies may have on our health, not only in defining, diagnosing, or treating diseases, but also in making us feel more vulnerable and less healthy in different regards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.