ArticleNature reviews. Clinical oncology2018
Diagnosis: CancerSEEK and destroy - a blood test for early cancer detection.
Article in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a serum peptidomic signature for early detection of asymptomatic ovarian cancer: A multi-center prospective study.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Longitudinal multiomics analysis of endocrine therapy effects and gut microbiota in breast cancer recurrence.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Virtual medicine: medical AI in human health and diseases.Military Medical Research · 2026Review
- Signals Ahead: Balancing Cancer Detection Innovation and Evidence.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Clinical Evaluation of a Multi-Omic Diagnostic Model for Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer Detection.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Socioeconomic impact of artificial intelligence-driven point-of-care testing devices for liquid biopsy in the OncoCheck system.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2025Review
- Revolution of Circulating Tumor DNA: From Bench Innovations to Bedside Implementations.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Novel mRNA biomarker-based liquid biopsy for the detection of resectable pancreatic cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Impact of clinical factors on accuracy of ovarian cancer detection via platelet RNA profiling.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Advances in colorectal cancer screening: technological innovations, guideline discrepancies, and individualized strategies.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Stool and blood biomarkers for colorectal cancer management: an update on screening and disease monitoring.Molecular cancer · 2024Review
- Clinical Applications of Circulating Tumor DNA Profiling in GI Cancers.JCO oncology practice · 2024Review
- A Comprehensive Review of Protein Biomarkers for Invasive Lung Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
- Technology and Future of Multi-Cancer Early Detection.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Liquid biopsies and those three little words: finding the perfect match for the MTB.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2023Article
- Earlier Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer: Is It Possible?Cancers · 2023Review
- Using cfDNA and ctDNA as Oncologic Markers: A Path to Clinical Validation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Circulating Cell-Free Nucleic Acids as Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Pancreatic Cancer.Biomedicines · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29405203What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.