Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29411044›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2018

Second consensus on the assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: results from a task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

Can Ince, E Christiaan Boerma, Maurizio Cecconi, Daniel De Backer, Nathan I Shapiro, Jacques Duranteau, Michael R Pinsky, Antonio Artigas, Jean-Louis Teboul, Irwin K M Reiss and 16 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 226 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
226citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
31.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04693923 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Capillary Refill Time Response to a Rapid Fluid Challenge in Septic Shock Patients: Pathophysiological Determinants, and Relation to Changes in Systemic, Regional and Microcirculatory Blood Flow

TypeinterventionalSponsorPontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileRan2021 to 2023Enrolled42ConditionsSeptic ShockArmsFluid challenge
NCT05180409 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The Prognostic Value of Simultaneous Assessment of Microcirculation Alteration With Sublingual Microcirculation and Near-infrared Spectroscopy on the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome of Various Phenotypes

TypeobservationalSponsorChang Gung Memorial HospitalRan2020 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
NCT07184476 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of Microvascular Circulation in the Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Patient

TypeobservationalSponsorBoston Children's HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsTetrology of Fallot
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

226 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 465 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. From Glycocalyx Shedding to Microvascular Collapse in Sepsis: Endothelial Pathophysiology, Organ Dysfunction, and Mechanistic Biomarkers.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026
    Review
  20. Article

166 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 15 institutions in 11 countries.

Can InceDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. c.ince@erasmusmc.nl.
E Christiaan BoermaDepartment of Intensive Care, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Maurizio CecconiAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, St George's Hospital and Medical School, London, UK.
Daniel De BackerDepartment of Intensive Care, CHIREC Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Nathan I ShapiroDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Center for Vascular Biology Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jacques DuranteauAnesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Sud, Hôpital De Bicêtre, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Michael R PinskyDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Antonio ArtigasCritical Care Center, Hospital de Sabadell, CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain.
Jean-Louis TeboulService de Réanimation Médicale Hôpital de Bicêtre, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, AP-HP, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Irwin K M ReissDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Cesar AldecoaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Surgical Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain.
Sam D HutchingsKings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK.
Abele DonatiAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Marco MaggioriniMedical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Fabio S TacconeDepartment of Intensive Care, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium.
Glenn HernandezDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Didier PayenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Lariboisière Hospital, University of Paris Denis Diderot 7, Paris, France.
Dick TibboelIntensive Care and Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Daniel S MartinIntensive Care Unit, University College London, London, UK.
Alexander ZarbockDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Munster, Germany.
Xavier MonnetService de Réanimation Médicale Hôpital de Bicêtre, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, AP-HP, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Arnaldo DubinServicio de Terapia Intensiva, Sanatorio Otamendi y Miroli, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Jan BakkerDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jean-Louis VincentDepartment of Intensive Care, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium.
Thomas W L ScheerenDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Cardiovascular Dynamics Section of the ESICM
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLErasmus MC · NLMarche Polytechnic University · ITSt George's Hospital · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversité Paris-Sud · FRUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USErasmus Hospital · BEErasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NLKing's College Hospital · GBUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHand-held vital microscopes (HVMs) were introduced to observe sublingual microcirculatory alterations at the bedside in different shock states in critically ill patients. This consensus aims to provide clinicians with guidelines for practical use and interpretation of the sublingual microcirculation. Furthermore, it aims to promote the integration of routine application of HVM microcirculatory monitoring in conventional hemodynamic monitoring of systemic hemodynamic variables.

methodsIn accordance with the Delphi method we organized three international expert meetings to discuss the various aspects of the technology, physiology, measurements, and clinical utility of HVM sublingual microcirculatory monitoring to formulate this consensus document. A task force from the Cardiovascular Dynamics Section of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (with endorsement of its Executive Committee) created this consensus as an update of a previous consensus in 2007. We classified consensus statements as definitions, requirements, and/or recommendations, with a minimum requirement of 80% agreement of all participants.

resultsIn this consensus the nature of microcirculatory alterations is described. The nature of variables, which can be extracted from analysis of microcirculatory images, is presented and the needed dataset of variables to identify microcirculatory alterations is defined. Practical aspects of sublingual HVM measurements and the nature of artifacts are described. Eleven statements were formulated that pertained to image acquisitions and quality statements. Fourteen statements addressed the analysis of the images, and 13 statements are related to future developments.

conclusionThis consensus describes 25 statements regarding the acquisition and interpretation of microcirculatory images needed to guide the assessment of the microcirculation in critically ill patients.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessMicrocirculationCritical CareHumansMouth FloorFluid therapyHemodynamic monitoringIDF imagingIntensive careMicrocirculationOPS imagingSDF imagingSepsisShockSublingual

Identifiers

PMID29411044
OpenAlexW2786979539

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.