Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29427024›Full record

ArticleHeart and vessels2018

Comparison of the effects of linagliptin and voglibose on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease: a prospective, randomized, pilot study (EFFORT).

Taku Koyama, Atsushi Tanaka, Hisako Yoshida, Jun-Ichi Oyama, Shigeru Toyoda, Masashi Sakuma, Teruo Inoue, Yoritaka Otsuka, Koichi Node

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heart and vessels, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Taku KoyamaDepartment of Cardiology, Fukuoka Wajiro Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Atsushi TanakaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University, 5-5-1 Nabeshima, Saga, Japan. tanakaa2@cc.saga-u.ac.jp.
Hisako YoshidaClinical Research Center, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Jun-Ichi OyamaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University, 5-5-1 Nabeshima, Saga, Japan.
Shigeru ToyodaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Japan.
Masashi SakumaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Japan.
Teruo InoueDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Japan.
Yoritaka OtsukaDepartment of Cardiology, Fukuoka Wajiro Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Koichi NodeDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University, 5-5-1 Nabeshima, Saga, Japan. node@cc.saga-u.ac.jp.
Saga University · JPDokkyo Medical University · JPUji Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endothelial dysfunction contributes to poor cardiovascular prognosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and coronary artery disease (CAD). The effect of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on endothelial function remains controversial. We sought to compare the effects of linagliptin and voglibose on endothelial function, as assessed by reactive hyperemia-peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT). Sixteen patients with newly diagnosed T2DM and CAD were randomized 1:1 to linagliptin (5 mg, once-daily) or voglibose (0.9 mg, thrice-daily). The RH-PAT and laboratory parameters, including 75 g oral glucose tolerance test, were measured at baseline and 3 months. Linagliptin increased serum levels of active glucagon-like peptide-1 and high-molecular-weight adiponectin. Age-, sex-, and baseline-adjusted changes in logarithmic RH-PAT index (LnRHI) after 3 months were significant between groups (linagliptin, 0.135 ± 0.097; voglibose, - 0.124 ± 0.091; P = 0.047). In the linagliptin group, change in LnRHI was positively correlated with change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and negatively correlated with changes in both urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. Furthermore, linagliptin treatment for 3 months reduced serum levels of both glucose and insulin at 2 h, relative to voglibose, in the age-, sex-, and baseline-adjusted model. Linagliptin improved endothelial function relative to voglibose, accompanied by amelioration of glycemic, renal, and cardiometabolic parameters, in patients with newly diagnosed T2DM and CAD.Trial registration Unique Trial Number, UMIN 000029169 ( https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000012442 ).

Indexed as

AgedCoronary Artery DiseaseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dose-Response Relationship, DrugEndothelium, VascularFemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInositolLinagliptinMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPrognosisProspective StudiesVasodilationHypoglycemic AgentsInositolLinagliptinvogliboseCoronary artery diseaseEndothelial functionLinagliptinType 2 diabetes mellitusVoglibose

Identifiers

PMID29427024
OpenAlexW2793520103

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.