ArticleTemperature (Austin, Tex.)2017
Intradermal administration of atrial natriuretic peptide has no effect on sweating and cutaneous vasodilator responses in young male adults.
Article in Temperature (Austin, Tex.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heat Therapy: Targeting Health, Disease, and Disability.Comprehensive Physiology · 2026Review
- Article
- Physiology of sweat gland function: The roles of sweating and sweat composition in human health.Temperature (Austin, Tex.) · 2019Review
- The effect of exogenous activation of protease-activated receptor 2 on cutaneous vasodilatation and sweating in young males during rest and exercise in the heat.Temperature (Austin, Tex.) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) increases during exercise in the heat wherein heat loss responses of sweating and cutaneous vasodilatation are activated. Hence ANP might be involved in the regulation of sweating and cutaneous vasodilatation. However, whether ANP directly mediates sweating and cutaneous vasodilatation needs to be clarified. Also, muscarinic receptor activation induces sweating and cutaneous vasodilatation, however, it remains to be determined whether ANP modulates these responses. In this study, in 11 young males (25 ± 5 years), cutaneous vascular conductance and sweat rate were assessed at intradermal microdialysis sites that were continuously perfused with either lactated Ringer (Control) or 3 different concentrations of ANP (0.1, 1, 10 µM). All 4 sites were co-administrated with methacholine, a muscarinic receptor agonist, in a dose-dependent fashion (0.0125, 0.25, 5, 100, and 2000 mM, 25 min for each). ANP at all concentrations did not increase sweat rate and cutaneous vascular conductance as compared with pre-ANP infusion values (all P > 0.05). Methacholine increased both sweat rate and cutaneous vascular conductance (all P ≤ 0.05). However, the responses were unaffected by co-administration of ANP relative to methacholine only, even as assessed in context of the methacholine concentration required to elicit 50% of the maximal response (EC50) (all P > 0.05). We show that exogenous ANP administration intradermally does not directly modulate sweating and cutaneous vasodilatation under room temperature conditions in resting young adults. Further, there is no effect of ANP on muscarinic sweating and cutaneous vasodilatation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.