Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29440433›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Windowed Granger causal inference strategy improves discovery of gene regulatory networks.

Justin D Finkle, Jia J Wu, Neda Bagheri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Network-based approaches for modeling disease regulation and progression.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Granger causal inference on DAGs identifies genomic loci regulating transcription.... International Conference on Learning Representations · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Justin D FinkleInterdisciplinary Biological Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.
Jia J WuInterdisciplinary Biological Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.
Neda BagheriInterdisciplinary Biological Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208; n-bagheri@northwestern.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0146-4627

Funding

Developing Capacity to Evaluate Training Programs via Development of Human, Institutional and Social CapitalT32GM008449 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI LEONARD, JOSHUA NATHANIEL · 1993 to 2023
$7.8M
Integrative Epigenetic Analysis and Ex Vivo Generation of Megakaryocytes from Umbilical Cord BloodF31HL134331 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI WU, JIA JIE · 2016 to 2017
$76k
NHLBI NIH HHS F31 HL134331NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate inference of regulatory networks from experimental data facilitates the rapid characterization and understanding of biological systems. High-throughput technologies can provide a wealth of time-series data to better interrogate the complex regulatory dynamics inherent to organisms, but many network inference strategies do not effectively use temporal information. We address this limitation by introducing Sliding Window Inference for Network Generation (SWING), a generalized framework that incorporates multivariate Granger causality to infer network structure from time-series data. SWING moves beyond existing Granger methods by generating windowed models that simultaneously evaluate multiple upstream regulators at several potential time delays. We demonstrate that SWING elucidates network structure with greater accuracy in both in silico and experimentally validated in vitro systems. We estimate the apparent time delays present in each system and demonstrate that SWING infers time-delayed, gene-gene interactions that are distinct from baseline methods. By providing a temporal framework to infer the underlying directed network topology, SWING generates testable hypotheses for gene-gene influences.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksAlgorithmsComputational BiologyEscherichia coliProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalSaccharomyces cerevisiaegene regulatory networksGranger causalitymachine learningnetwork inferencetime-series analysis

Identifiers

PMID29440433
PMCPMC5834671

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.