Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29440686›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

araGWAB: Network-based boosting of genome-wide association studies in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Tak Lee, Insuk Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tak LeeDepartment of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Yonsei University, Seoul, 03722, Korea.
Insuk LeeDepartment of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Yonsei University, Seoul, 03722, Korea. insuklee@yonsei.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been applied for the genetic dissection of complex phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana. However, the significantly associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) could not explain all the phenotypic variations. A major reason for missing true phenotype-associated loci is the strict P-value threshold after adjustment for multiple hypothesis tests to reduce false positives. This statistical limitation can be partly overcome by increasing the sample size, but at a much higher cost. Alternatively, weak phenotype-association signals can be boosted by integrating other types of data. Here, we present a web application for network-based Arabidopsis genome-wide association boosting-araGWAB-which augments the likelihood of association with the given phenotype by integrating GWAS summary statistics (SNP P-values) and co-functional gene network information. The integration utilized the inherent values of SNPs with subthreshold significance, thus substantially increasing the information usage of GWAS data. We found that araGWAB could more effectively retrieve genes known to be associated with various phenotypes relevant to defense against bacterial pathogens, flowering time regulation, and organ development in A. thaliana. We also found that many of the network-boosted candidate genes for the phenotypes were supported by previous publications. The araGWAB is freely available at http://www.inetbio.org/aragwab/ .

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksGenome-Wide Association StudyArabidopsisInternetPhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID29440686
PMCPMC5811503

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.