Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29459739›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Localization of adaptive variants in human genomes using averaged one-dependence estimation.

Lauren Alpert Sugden, Elizabeth G Atkinson, Annie P Fischer, Stephen Rong, Brenna M Henn, Sohini Ramachandran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Selection scans and downstream analysis with selscan.Human population genetics and genomics · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Selection scans and downstream analysis with selscan.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Digital Image Processing to Detect Adaptive Evolution.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. IntroUNET: identifying introgressed alleles via semantic segmentation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lauren Alpert SugdenCenter for Computational Molecular Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912, USA. lauren_alpert@brown.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3495-8359
Elizabeth G AtkinsonDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
Annie P FischerDivision of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.
Stephen RongCenter for Computational Molecular Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.
Brenna M HennDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
Sohini RamachandranCenter for Computational Molecular Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912, USA. sramachandran@brown.edu.

Funding

The role of Sirtuins in neurodegenerative diseaseP20GM109035 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI WU, ZHIJIN JEAN · 2016 to 2025
$22.6M
IRACDA - The New York Consortium for the Advancement of Postdoctoral Scholars (NY CAPS)Phase IIK12GM102778 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI Carol A. Carter, Karian Janice Wright · 2012 to 2026
$13.1M
Novel statistical methods to localize genomic elements underlying adaptive evolutionR01GM118652 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI RAMACHANDRAN, SOHINI · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statistical methods for identifying adaptive mutations from population genetic data face several obstacles: assessing the significance of genomic outliers, integrating correlated measures of selection into one analytic framework, and distinguishing adaptive variants from hitchhiking neutral variants. Here, we introduce SWIF(r), a probabilistic method that detects selective sweeps by learning the distributions of multiple selection statistics under different evolutionary scenarios and calculating the posterior probability of a sweep at each genomic site. SWIF(r) is trained using simulations from a user-specified demographic model and explicitly models the joint distributions of selection statistics, thereby increasing its power to both identify regions undergoing sweeps and localize adaptive mutations. Using array and exome data from 45 ‡Khomani San hunter-gatherers of southern Africa, we identify an enrichment of adaptive signals in genes associated with metabolism and obesity. SWIF(r) provides a transparent probabilistic framework for localizing beneficial mutations that is extensible to a variety of evolutionary scenarios.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, GeneticMutationAdaptation, PhysiologicalAfrica, SouthernGenetics, PopulationGenome, HumanHuman Genome ProjectHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProbabilitySelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID29459739
PMCPMC5818606

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.