Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29471100›Full record

Trial reportNeuroImage2018

Dynamic fMRI networks predict success in a behavioral weight loss program among older adults.

Fatemeh Mokhtari, W Jack Rejeski, Yingying Zhu, Guorong Wu, Sean L Simpson, Jonathan H Burdette, Paul J Laurienti

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Triple network dynamics and future alcohol consumption in adolescents.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Fetal programming of human energy homeostasis brain networks: Issues and considerations.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fatemeh MokhtariLaboratory for Complex Brain Networks, Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA; Virginia Tech-Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA.
W Jack RejeskiLaboratory for Complex Brain Networks, Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA; Translational Science Center, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC, USA; Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC, USA; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC, USA.
Yingying ZhuDepartment of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Guorong WuDepartment of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Sean L SimpsonLaboratory for Complex Brain Networks, Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA; Virginia Tech-Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA; Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA.
Jonathan H BurdetteLaboratory for Complex Brain Networks, Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA; Translational Science Center, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC, USA.
Paul J LaurientiLaboratory for Complex Brain Networks, Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA; Translational Science Center, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC, USA. Electronic address: plaurien@wakehealth.edu.
Wake Forest University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Wake Forest Claude D. Pepper OAIC - RenewalP30AG021332 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LEON LENCHIK · 2002 to 2026
$36.4M
Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001420 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ARD, JAMY D, FOLEY, KRISTIE L · 2015 to 2023
$32.3M
Wake Forest Alzheimer's Disease Core CenterP30AG049638 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WILLIAMSON, JEFF DOUGLAS · 2016 to 2020
$12.2M
Cooperative Lifestyle Intervention Programs (CLIP-II)R18HL076441 · NHLBI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY · PI MARSH, ANTHONY P, REJESKI, WALTER JOHN · 2012 to 2016
$3.1M
Statistical Methods for Whole-Brain Connectivety NetworksK25EB012236 · NIBIB · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SIMPSON, SEAN L · 2012 to 2016
$796k
Longitudinal Analysis for Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer's DiseaseK01AG049089 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WU, GUORONG · 2016 to 2019
$478k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001420NHLBI NIH HHS R18 HL076441NIA NIH HHS K01 AG049089NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021332NIA NIH HHS P30 AG049638NIBIB NIH HHS K25 EB012236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than one-third of adults in the United States are obese, with a higher prevalence among older adults. Obesity among older adults is a major cause of physical dysfunction, hypertension, diabetes, and coronary heart diseases. Many people who engage in lifestyle weight loss interventions fail to reach targeted goals for weight loss, and most will regain what was lost within 1-2 years following cessation of treatment. This variability in treatment efficacy suggests that there are important phenotypes predictive of success with intentional weight loss that could lead to tailored treatment regimen, an idea that is consistent with the concept of precision-based medicine. Although the identification of biochemical and metabolic phenotypes are one potential direction of research, neurobiological measures may prove useful as substantial behavioral change is necessary to achieve success in a lifestyle intervention. In the present study, we use dynamic brain networks from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data to prospectively identify individuals most likely to succeed in a behavioral weight loss intervention. Brain imaging was performed in overweight or obese older adults (age: 65-79 years) who participated in an 18-month lifestyle weight loss intervention. Machine learning and functional brain networks were combined to produce multivariate prediction models. The prediction accuracy exceeded 95%, suggesting that there exists a consistent pattern of connectivity which correctly predicts success with weight loss at the individual level. Connectivity patterns that contributed to the prediction consisted of complex multivariate network components that substantially overlapped with known brain networks that are associated with behavior emergence, self-regulation, body awareness, and the sensory features of food. Future work on independent datasets and diverse populations is needed to corroborate our findings. Additionally, we believe that efforts can begin to examine whether these models have clinical utility in tailoring treatment.

Indexed as

Weight Reduction ProgramsAgedBrainDiet, ReducingExerciseExercise TherapyFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetObesityOverweightResistance TrainingBehavioral weight loss interventionsDynamic fMRI networksMachine learningObesityOlder adultsPrediction

Identifiers

PMID29471100
PMCPMC5911254
OpenAlexW2793875056

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.