Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29474499›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Risk factors control for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in men: Evidence from the Aragon Workers Health Study (AWHS).

Isabel Aguilar-Palacio, Sara Malo, Cristina Feja, MªJesús Lallana, Montserrat León-Latre, José Antonio Casasnovas, MªJosé Rabanaque, Eliseo Guallar

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Isabel Aguilar-PalacioPreventive Medicine and Public Health Department, Zaragoza University, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7293-701X
Sara MaloPreventive Medicine and Public Health Department, Zaragoza University, Zaragoza, Spain.
Cristina FejaPreventive Medicine and Public Health Department, Zaragoza University, Zaragoza, Spain.
MªJesús LallanaAragon Institute for Health Research (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain.
Montserrat León-LatrePrimary Health Care, Servicio Aragonés de Salud, Zaragoza, Spain.
José Antonio CasasnovasAragon Institute for Health Research (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain.
MªJosé RabanaquePreventive Medicine and Public Health Department, Zaragoza University, Zaragoza, Spain.
Eliseo GuallarEpidemiology Department, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States of America.
Universidad de Zaragoza · ESServicio Aragonés de Salud · ESJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Benefits of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors control are well known, but goals achievement remains low. The objective of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of CVD risk factors among men ina worker's cohort with no previous CVD, to study control variations across time and the factors associated with poor control. To this end, we conducted a cohort reexamination (2010-2014) within the context of the Aragon Workers Health Study (AWHS). Data from working characteristics, analytical values and pharmacological prescription were included in the analysis. Prevalences of risk factor diagnosis and control were calculated, as well as factors associated with poor control. The prevalence of CVD risk factors was high. In 2014dyslipidaemia was the most prevalent (85.2%) followed by Hypertension (HT) (42.0%). People under treatment increased for the period analysed (p<0.001). The proportion of people treated varied from 72.2% in Diabetes Mellitus to 31.1% in dyslipidaemia in 2014. 46.2% of the workers with HT were controlled, decreasing to 21.9% in Diabetes and 11.0% in dyslipidaemia (2014). Working in a turn different to central shift was associated with poor control, especially for those working at night with HT (Odds Ratio in 2010: 3.6; Confidence Interval 95% 1.8-7.4) and dyslipidaemia (Odds Ratio 2010: 4.7; Confidence Interval 95% 1.3-16.4). We conclude that, although CVD control has increased significantly for the period studied, there are still many people that do not receive any treatment, and control goals are normally not achieved.

Indexed as

AdultCardiovascular DiseasesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPrimary PreventionRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID29474499
PMCPMC5825136
OpenAlexW2788758843

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.