ArticleNeuroinformatics2018
Decoding Auditory Saliency from Brain Activity Patterns during Free Listening to Naturalistic Audio Excerpts.
Article in Neuroinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Auditory-GAN: deep learning framework for improved auditory spatial attention detection.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Diverse Task Classification from Activation Patterns of Functional Neuro-Images Using Feature Fusion Module.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Editorial: Computational modeling methods for naturalistic neuroimaging data.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023Article
- Explaining neural activity in human listeners with deep learning via natural language processing of narrative text.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- 4D Modeling of fMRI Data via Spatio-Temporal Convolutional Neural Networks (ST-CNN).IEEE transactions on cognitive and developmental systems · 2020Article
- Recognizing Brain States Using Deep Sparse Recurrent Neural Network.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, natural stimuli such as audio excerpts or video streams have received increasing attention in neuroimaging studies. Compared with conventional simple, idealized and repeated artificial stimuli, natural stimuli contain more unrepeated, dynamic and complex information that are more close to real-life. However, there is no direct correspondence between the stimuli and any sensory or cognitive functions of the brain, which makes it difficult to apply traditional hypothesis-driven analysis methods (e.g., the general linear model (GLM)). Moreover, traditional data-driven methods (e.g., independent component analysis (ICA)) lack quantitative modeling of stimuli, which may limit the power of analysis models. In this paper, we propose a sparse representation based decoding framework to explore the neural correlates between the computational audio features and functional brain activities under free listening conditions. First, we adopt a biologically-plausible auditory saliency feature to quantitatively model the audio excerpts and meanwhile develop sparse representation/dictionary learning method to learn an over-complete dictionary basis of brain activity patterns. Then, we reconstruct the auditory saliency features from the learned fMRI-derived dictionaries. After that, a group-wise analysis procedure is conducted to identify the associated brain regions and networks. Experiments showed that the auditory saliency feature can be well decoded from brain activity patterns by our methods, and the identified brain regions and networks are consistent and meaningful. At last, our method is evaluated and compared with ICA method and experimental results demonstrated the superiority of our methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29488069What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.