Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29496749›Full record

ArticleGenetics2018

Genetic Basis of Body Color and Spotting Pattern in Redheaded Pine Sawfly Larvae (

Catherine R Linnen, Claire T O'Quin, Taylor Shackleford, Connor R Sears, Carita Lindstedt

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Ecology of Hybrid Incompatibilities.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Apollo: Democratizing genome annotation.PLoS computational biology · 2019
    Article
  8. High detectability costs select weak warning signals in chemically defended gregarious prey.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Catherine R LinnenDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506 Catherine.linnen@uky.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5715-456X
Claire T O'QuinDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506.
Taylor ShacklefordDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506.
Connor R SearsDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506.
Carita LindstedtCentre of Excellence in Biological Interactions, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, FI-40014 Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8176-3613
University of Kentucky · USUniversity of Jyväskylä · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pigmentation has emerged as a premier model for understanding the genetic basis of phenotypic evolution, and a growing catalog of color loci is starting to reveal biases in the mutations, genes, and genetic architectures underlying color variation in the wild. However, existing studies have sampled a limited subset of taxa, color traits, and developmental stages. To expand the existing sample of color loci, we performed QTL mapping analyses on two types of larval pigmentation traits that vary among populations of the redheaded pine sawfly (

Indexed as

Genetic Association StudiesPigmentationQuantitative Trait, HeritableQuantitative Trait LociAnimalsChromosome MappingFemaleGenetic LinkageGenome, InsectHymenopteraLarvaPhenotypecarotenoidsconvergent evolutionevolutionary geneticsgenetic architecturemelaninpigmentation

Identifiers

PMID29496749
PMCPMC5937194
OpenAlexW2794370399

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.