Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29511368›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical sciences2018

Bone Turnover Status: Classification Model and Clinical Implications.

Alexander Fisher, Leon Fisher, Wichat Srikusalanukul, Paul N Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The role of bone turnover markers in screening low bone mineral density and their relationship with fracture risk in the postmenopausal period.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexander FisherDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT Health, Canberra, Australia.
Leon FisherFrankston Hospital, Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Wichat SrikusalanukulDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT Health, Canberra, Australia.
Paul N SmithDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT Health, Canberra, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersBone DensityBone RemodelingBone ResorptionCollagen Type IFemaleHip FracturesHumansMaleOsteogenesisPeptide FragmentsPeptidesProcollagenBiomarkersCollagen Type Icollagen type I trimeric cross-linked peptidePeptide FragmentsPeptidesProcollagenprocollagen Type I N-terminal peptidebone turnover markersclassificationnonvertebral fractureprediction

Identifiers

PMID29511368
PMCPMC5835703

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.