ArticleHealth services research2018
Robust Machine Learning Variable Importance Analyses of Medical Conditions for Health Care Spending.
Article in Health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Algorithms to Improve Fairness in Medicare Risk Adjustment.JAMA health forum · 2025Article
- Constructing prediction models and analyzing factors in suicidal ideation using machine learning, focusing on the older population.PloS one · 2024Article
- Evaluating the robustness of targeted maximum likelihood estimators via realistic simulations in nutrition intervention trials.Statistics in medicine · 2022Article
- Identifying undercompensated groups defined by multiple attributes in risk adjustment.BMJ health & care informatics · 2021Article
- Intersections of machine learning and epidemiological methods for health services research.International journal of epidemiology · 2021Article
- Using Deep Learning to Identify High-Risk Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2021Article
- Estimating treatment effects with machine learning.Health services research · 2019Observational
- Predicting patient-reported outcomes following hip and knee replacement surgery using supervised machine learning.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo propose nonparametric double robust machine learning in variable importance analyses of medical conditions for health spending. DATA SOURCES: 2011-2012 Truven MarketScan database. STUDY
designI evaluate how much more, on average, commercially insured enrollees with each of 26 of the most prevalent medical conditions cost per year after controlling for demographics and other medical conditions. This is accomplished within the nonparametric targeted learning framework, which incorporates ensemble machine learning. Previous literature studying the impact of medical conditions on health care spending has almost exclusively focused on parametric risk adjustment; thus, I compare my approach to parametric regression. PRINCIPAL
findingsMy results demonstrate that multiple sclerosis, congestive heart failure, severe cancers, major depression and bipolar disorders, and chronic hepatitis are the most costly medical conditions on average per individual. These findings differed from those obtained using parametric regression.
conclusionsThe literature may be underestimating the spending contributions of several medical conditions, which is a potentially critical oversight. If current methods are not capturing the true incremental effect of medical conditions, undesirable incentives related to care may remain. Further work is needed to directly study these issues in the context of federal formulas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.