Evidence mapPaperPMID 29565646Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2018

Introduction to a mechanism for automated myocardium boundary detection with displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE).

Julia Kar, Xiaodong Zhong, Michael V Cohen, Daniel Auger Cornejo, Angela Yates-Judice, Eduardo Rel, Maria S Figarola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2019 Case of the Week series.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julia Kar1 Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Pharmacology, University of South Alabama , Mobile, AL , USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1140-4310
Xiaodong Zhong2 MR R&D Collaborations, Siemens Healthcare Inc. , Atlanta, GA , USA.
Michael V Cohen3 Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama , Mobile, Al , USA.
Daniel Auger Cornejo4 Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia , Charlottesville, VA , USA.
Angela Yates-Judice5 Department of Radiology, University of South Alabama, 2451 USA Medical Center Drive , Mobile, AL , USA.
Eduardo Rel5 Department of Radiology, University of South Alabama, 2451 USA Medical Center Drive , Mobile, AL , USA.
Maria S Figarola5 Department of Radiology, University of South Alabama, 2451 USA Medical Center Drive , Mobile, AL , USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDisplacement ENcoding with Stimulated Echoes (DENSE) is an MRI technique developed to encode phase related to myocardial tissue displacements, and the displacement information directly applied towards detecting left-ventricular (LV) myocardial motion during the cardiac cycle. The purpose of this study is to present a novel, three-dimensional (3D) DENSE displacement-based and magnitude image quantization-based, semi-automated detection technique for myocardial wall motion, whose boundaries are used for rapid and automated computation of 3D myocardial strain.

methodsThe architecture of this boundary detection algorithm is primarily based on pixelwise spatiotemporal increments in LV tissue displacements during the cardiac cycle and further reinforced by radially searching for pixel-based image gradients in multithreshold quantized magnitude images. This spatiotemporal edge detection methodology was applied to all LV partitions and their subsequent timeframes that lead to full 3D LV reconstructions. It was followed by quantifications of 3D chamber dimensions and myocardial strains, whose rapid computation was the primary motivation behind developing this algorithm. A pre-existing two-dimensional (2D) semi-automated contouring technique was used in parallel to validate the accuracy of the algorithm and both methods tested on DENSE data acquired in (N = 14) healthy subjects. Chamber quantifications between methods were compared using paired t-tests and Bland-Altman analysis established regional strain agreements.

resultsThere were no significant differences in the results of chamber quantifications between the 3D semi-automated and existing 2D boundary detection techniques. This included comparisons of ejection fractions, which were 0.62 ± 0.04 vs 0.60 ± 0.06 (p = 0.23) for apical, 0.60 ± 0.04 vs 0.59 ± 0.05 (p = 0.76) for midventricular and 0.56 ± 0.04 vs 0.58 ± 0.05 (p = 0.07) for basal segments, that were quantified using the 3D semi-automated and 2D pre-existing methodologies, respectively. Bland-Altman agreement between regional strains generated biases of 0.01 ± 0.06, -0.01 ± 0.01 and 0.0 ± 0.06 for the radial, circumferential and longitudinal directions, respectively.

conclusionA new, 3D semi-automated methodology for contouring the entire LV and rapidly generating chamber quantifications and regional strains is presented that was validated in relation to an existing 2D contouring technique. Advances in knowledge: This study introduced a scientific tool for rapid, semi-automated generation of clinical information regarding shape and function in the 3D LV.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsHeartHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine

Identifiers

PMID29565646
PMCPMC6221787

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.