ArticleInterventional cardiology (London, England)2016
Choice of Intracoronary Imaging: When to use Intravascular Ultrasound or Optical Coherence Tomography.
Article in Interventional cardiology (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- The current state of artificial intelligence-based invasive coronary angiography image analysis: a systematic review.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Review
- Cost-effectiveness of optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with complex coronary artery lesions in China: a markov model-based study.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Article
- Management of Calcified Coronary Lesions-A Review of Plaque Modification Methods.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease on Maintenance Dialysis.JACC. Asia · 2025Article
- Innovations in Intracoronary Imaging: Present Clinical Practices and Future Outlooks.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Long-term outcomes of IVUS-guided and angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for left main coronary artery disease: a retrospective consort study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Consensus of National Heart Center and the Saudi Arabian Cardiac Interventional Society on the Current Landscape of the Management of Intracoronary Calcification in Saudi Arabia.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2024Article
- Chest Pain Evaluation: Diagnostic Testing.CJC open · 2023Review
- Intracoronary Imaging: Current Practice and Future Perspectives.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Imaging in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Recent Advances in Transducers for Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Imaging.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Optical Coherence Tomography: Current Applications for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease and Guidance of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.Cardiology and therapy · 2020Review
- A Domain Enriched Deep Learning Approach to Classify Atherosclerosis using Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging.IEEE journal of selected topics in signal processing · 2020Article
- A post-market, multi-vessel evaluation of the imaging of peripheral arteries for diagnostic purposeS comparing optical Coherence tomogrApy and iNtravascular ultrasound imaging (SCAN).BMC medical imaging · 2020Article
- Techniques to Overcome Difficulty in Device Deliverability to Lesion in Complex PCI.Current cardiology reviews · 2020Review
- Optically Generated Ultrasound for Intracoronary Imaging.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020Review
- Capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducers for intravascular ultrasound imaging.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2020Review
- All-Optical Rotational Ultrasound Imaging.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- All-optical dual photoacoustic and optical coherence tomography intravascular probe.Photoacoustics · 2018Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracoronary imaging has the capability of accurately measuring vessel and stenosis dimensions, assessing vessel integrity, characterising lesion morphology and guiding optimal percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Coronary angiography used to detect and assess coronary stenosis severity has limitations. The 2D nature of fluoroscopic imaging provides lumen profile only and the assessment of coronary stenosis by visual estimation is subjective and prone to error. Performing PCI based on coronary angiography alone is inadequate for determining key metrics of the vessel such as dimension, extent of disease, and plaque distribution and composition. The advent of intracoronary imaging has offset the limitations of angiography and has shifted the paradigm to allow a detailed, objective appreciation of disease extent and morphology, vessel diameter, stent size and deployment and healing after PCI. It has become an essential tool in complex PCI, including rotational atherectomy, in follow-up of novel drug-eluting stent platforms and understanding the pathophysiology of stent failure after PCI (e.g. following stent thrombosis or in-stent restenosis). In this review we look at the two currently available and commonly used intracoronary imaging tools - intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography - and the merits of each.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.