Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29590633›Full record

ArticleDisease models & mechanisms2018

Disease Ontology: improving and unifying disease annotations across species.

Susan M Bello, Mary Shimoyama, Elvira Mitraka, Stanley J F Laulederkind, Cynthia L Smith, Janan T Eppig, Lynn M Schriml

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disease models & mechanisms, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI): latest news from MGD and GXD.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Susan M BelloThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA susan.bello@jax.org.ORCID 0000-0003-4606-0597
Mary ShimoyamaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1176-0796
Elvira MitrakaDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0719-3485
Stanley J F LaulederkindDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5356-4174
Cynthia L SmithThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3691-0324
Janan T EppigThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1652-8072
Lynn M SchrimlDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8910-9851

Funding

RAT GENOME DATABASER01HL064541 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI ANNE E. KWITEK · 1999 to 2026
$50.0M
Mouse Genome DatabaseU41HG000330 · NHGRI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BLAKE, JUDITH A, BULT, CAROL J · 2011 to 2020
$45.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG000330NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL064541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Model organisms are vital to uncovering the mechanisms of human disease and developing new therapeutic tools. Researchers collecting and integrating relevant model organism and/or human data often apply disparate terminologies (vocabularies and ontologies), making comparisons and inferences difficult. A unified disease ontology is required that connects data annotated using diverse disease terminologies, and in which the terminology relationships are continuously maintained. The Mouse Genome Database (MGD, http://www.informatics.jax.org), Rat Genome Database (RGD, http://rgd.mcw.edu) and Disease Ontology (DO, http://www.disease-ontology.org) projects are collaborating to augment DO, aligning and incorporating disease terms used by MGD and RGD, and improving DO as a tool for unifying disease annotations across species. Coordinated assessment of MGD's and RGD's disease term annotations identified new terms that enhance DO's representation of human diseases. Expansion of DO term content and cross-references to clinical vocabularies (e.g. OMIM, ORDO, MeSH) has enriched the DO's domain coverage and utility for annotating many types of data generated from experimental and clinical investigations. The extension of anatomy-based DO classification structure of disease improves accessibility of terms and facilitates application of DO for computational research. A consistent representation of disease associations across data types from cellular to whole organism, generated from clinical and model organism studies, will promote the integration, mining and comparative analysis of these data. The coordinated enrichment of the DO and adoption of DO by MGD and RGD demonstrates DO's usability across human data, MGD, RGD and the rest of the model organism database community.

Indexed as

Gene OntologyMolecular Sequence AnnotationAnimalsDatabases, GeneticDiseaseMiceRatsSpecies SpecificityDisease modelsMouseOntologiesRat

Identifiers

PMID29590633
PMCPMC5897730

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.