ReviewMethodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal
A Practical Approach to Assessing Stent Results with IVUS or OCT.
Review in Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Intravascular Ultrasound versus Angiography Guided Drug Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Coronary Intravascular Imaging: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques, Applications, and Future Directions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- The "Mushroom Sign": An Interesting Case Report of Extreme Stent Malapposition.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Long-term outcomes of IVUS-guided and angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for left main coronary artery disease: a retrospective consort study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Consensus of National Heart Center and the Saudi Arabian Cardiac Interventional Society on the Current Landscape of the Management of Intracoronary Calcification in Saudi Arabia.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2024Article
- Intravascular ultrasonography assisted carotid artery stenting for treatment of carotid stenosis: Two case reports.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Article
- Mechanically Rotating Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Transducer: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Left Main Disease and Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Focus on Antithrombotic Therapy.US cardiology · 2021Review
- A post-market, multi-vessel evaluation of the imaging of peripheral arteries for diagnostic purposeS comparing optical Coherence tomogrApy and iNtravascular ultrasound imaging (SCAN).BMC medical imaging · 2020Article
- Advances in IVUS/OCT and Future Clinical Perspective of Novel Hybrid Catheter System in Coronary Imaging.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary angiography is routinely used to assess the extent and severity of coronary artery disease and for decision-making during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). However, it is sometimes inadequate for deciding a strategy and defining optimal stenting outcomes. In this review, we present a comprehensive and practical approach to PCI using intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography to optimize stent deployment and assess procedural complications after stent implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.