Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29623915›Full record

ReviewNeural regeneration research2018

The relaxin peptide family - potential future hope for neuroprotective therapy? A short review.

Marius Nistor, Martin Schmidt, René Schiffner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural regeneration research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marius NistorDepartment of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Martin SchmidtInstitute for Biochemistry II, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
René SchiffnerDepartment of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University; Orthopaedic Department, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its discovery in the 1920's the relaxin peptide hormone family has not only grown in number to now seven members (relaxin-1, relaxin-2, relaxin-3, insulin-like peptide (INSL) 3, INSL4, INSL5 and INSL6), but ever more effects, suchs as vasodilatory, angiogenic, anti-apoptopic, anti-fibriotic and anti-inflammatory, have been linked to them. While relaxin-2 has mainly been investigated in the context of cardiac protection, most comprehensively in the RELAX-AHF and RELAX AHF2 studies, a small number of studies have furthermore assessed the potential neuroprotective effects of especially relaxin-2 and other members of the relaxin family. In this short review we summarise and discuss recent efforts to utilize relaxin hormones for neuroprotection and point out potential future fields of research and translational applications. While many questions still need to be answered, the promising results of the available studies definitely warrant future well-designed studies on neuroprotection by relaxin peptides.

Indexed as

cerebralhemorrhagic shockneuroprotectionrelaxinrelaxin-2stroke

Identifiers

PMID29623915
PMCPMC5900493

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.