Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29632602›Full record

ReviewEuropean endocrinology2017

Recombinant Human Insulin in Global Diabetes Management - Focus on Clinical Efficacy.

Jean Claude Mbanya, Juergen Sandow, Wolfgang Landgraf, David R Owens

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European endocrinology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jean Claude MbanyaUniversity of Yaoundé I, Cameroon and Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases Unit at the Hospital Central in Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Juergen SandowCentre of Pharmacology, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Wolfgang LandgrafMedical Affairs Diabetes Division, Sanofi-Aventis Frankfurt, Germany.
David R OwensDiabetes Research Group, College of Medicine, University of Swansea, Wales, UK.
Central Hospital of Yaoundé · CMGoethe University Frankfurt · DESanofi (Germany) · DESwansea University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biosynthetic human insulin and insulin analogues are the mainstay of insulin therapy for both type 1 and type 2 diabetes although access to human insulin at affordable prices remains a global issue. The world is experiencing an exponential rise in the prevalence of diabetes presenting an urgent need to establish effective diabetes therapy in countries burdened by inadequate health care budgets, malnutrition and infectious diseases. Recombinant human insulin has replaced animal insulins and animal-based semisynthetic human insulin thereby available in sufficient quantities and at affordable prices able to provide global access to insulin therapy. In many patients, analog insulins can offer additional clinical benefit, although at a considerably higher price thus severely restricting availability in low income countries. The approval process for recombinant human insulins (i.e. biosimilars) and analogue insulins is highly variable in the developing countries in contrast to Europe and in North America, where it is well established within a strict regulatory framework. This review aims to discuss the future access to human insulin therapy in a global context with an ever increasing burden of diabetes and significant economic implications.

Indexed as

biosimilar and analogue insulinsbiosynthetic human insulincostDiabetes mellitusglobal accessregulatory requirements

Identifiers

PMID29632602
PMCPMC5813441
OpenAlexW2604725688

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.