Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29645321›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2018

Maternal perceptions of BRCA genetic counseling communication processes about disclosing cancer risk information to children and adult relatives.

Jada G Hamilton, Beth N Peshkin, Darren Mays, Tiffani A DeMarco, Andrea Farkas Patenaude, Kenneth P Tercyak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jada G HamiltonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8377-4666
Beth N PeshkinCancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Darren MaysCancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Tiffani A DeMarcoCancer Genetics Program, Inova Translational Medicine Institute, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Andrea Farkas PatenaudeDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Kenneth P TercyakCancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI Louis M Weiner · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
Parent Communication of BRCA1/2 Test Results to ChildrenR01HG002686 · NHGRI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI TERCYAK, KENNETH · 2003 to 2009
$3.1M
Adolescents' Long-Term Adaptation to Familial Cancer RisksR01CA137625 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI TERCYAK, KENNETH · 2010 to 2014
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NCI NIH HHS R01 CA137625NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesUsing a novel measure, examine maternal perceptions of the process by which issues pertaining to family communication of BRCA test results are addressed during cancer genetic counseling.

methodsAfter receiving BRCA results, mothers (N = 211) of minor-age children reported on their counseling experiences with providers using a communication process measure as well as other psychosocial variables.

resultsThe novel Genetic Counseling Communication Process measure demonstrated good internal consistency of its 2 factors: patient-led communication (Cronbach's α = 0.73) and provider-led communication (Cronbach's α = 0.82). Participants most often reported that discussions about family communication of BRCA test results to children and adult relatives were led only by their providers (38.2%-39.2%), as opposed to being led by the patient, both parties, or neither party. Providers were most likely to lead these discussions when mothers had stronger family histories of cancer and expressed more confidence about making a decision to talk to their children about BRCA. However, mothers typically led such discussions if they were raising older children and held more positive attitudes about pediatric BRCA testing.

conclusionsWhen the assessment of BRCA genetic counseling outcomes includes family communication to potentially at-risk relatives, we learned that most but not all sessions addressed this topic. Cancer family history, child age, and maternal attitudes are important co-factors in these patient-provider communication exchanges. Providers delivering BRCA genetic counseling should be attentive to mothers' information and support needs regarding communicating cancer genetic test results to at-risk relatives, including children.

Indexed as

DisclosureMother-Child RelationsAdolescentAdultBreast NeoplasmsChildDecision MakingFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansMiddle AgedOvarian Neoplasmsbreast cancerchildrenfamily communicationgenetic counselinggenetic testingmothersoncology

Identifiers

PMID29645321
PMCPMC6490676

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.