Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29668697›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2018

Efficacy and safety of biosimilar insulins compared to their reference products: A systematic review.

Carolyn Tieu, Eleanor J Lucas, Mindi DePaola, Lori Rosman, G Caleb Alexander

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Drug Delivery Technologies for the Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Regulatory Evaluation of Biosimilars: Refinement of Principles Based on the Scientific Evidence and Clinical Experience.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. An Efficient Development Paradigm for Biosimilars.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carolyn TieuDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD United States of America.
Eleanor J LucasPharmerit International, Bethesda, MA United States of America.
Mindi DePaolaDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD United States of America.
Lori RosmanWelch Medical Library, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
G Caleb AlexanderDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5622-2986
Johns Hopkins University · USPharmerit (United States) · US

Funding

ENHANCING REGULATORY SCIENCE THROUGH A UNIQUE FDA-ACADEMIC PARTNERSHIPU01FD004977 · FDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ALEXANDER, G. CALEB · 2014 to 2015
$1.2M
FDA HHS U01 FD004977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceFor nearly a century, no generic form of insulin has been available in the United States. However, the first biosimilar insulin, Basaglar, was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2015, and subsequently Admelog and Lusduna in 2017.

objectiveTo summarize the scientific evidence comparing the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of biosimilar and reference insulin products. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a systematic review using PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Latin America and Caribbean Health Sciences, South Asian Database of Controlled Clinical Trials, and IndiaMED from their inception through January 14, 2018. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing safety, clinical efficacy, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of any biosimilar insulin with a reference product in adults regardless of sample size and location. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two researchers independently reviewed all titles, abstracts and text; extracted data; and performed quality assessments. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of biosimilar and reference insulin products.

resultsOf 6945 articles screened, 11 studies were included in the data synthesis. LY2963016, Basalog, Basalin, and MK-1293 were compared to Lantus while SAR342434 was compared to Humalog. Three trials enrolled healthy volunteers, five enrolled type 1 diabetics, and two enrolled type 2 diabetics. One study enrolled both healthy and type 1 diabetics. Of the eleven studies, six examined pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic parameters and five examined clinical efficacy and immunogenicity. All studies included adverse events. All PK and/or PD studies showed that comparable parameters of biosimilar and reference products were within the pre-specified equivalence margins. Clinical studies suggested similar clinical efficacy and immunogenicity. Adverse events were similar between the groups across all studies. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Few published studies have compared biosimilar and reference insulins, though those that did suggest that the biosimilars have comparable safety and clinical efficacy as its reference product.

Indexed as

Biosimilar PharmaceuticalsDiabetes MellitusHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsHypoglycemic AgentsInsulins

Identifiers

PMID29668697
PMCPMC5905882
OpenAlexW2800784996

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.