SynthesisPloS one2018
Efficacy and safety of biosimilar insulins compared to their reference products: A systematic review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discontinuation and Switchback After Non-Medical Switching from Originator Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF) Inhibitors to Biosimilars: A Meta-Analysis of Real-World Studies from 2012 to 2018.Advances in therapy · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy and immunogenicity of insulin biosimilar compared to their reference products: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC endocrine disorders · 2022Pooled it
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Ultra-Long-Acting, Long-Acting, Intermediate-Acting, and Biosimilar Insulins for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Pooled it
- From medicine price control to deregulation: assessing policy effects on insulin access in Pakistan's private pharmacies.PloS one · 2026Article
- Drug Delivery Technologies for the Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Article
- Development and Characterization of Guinea Pig Anti-Insulin Polyclonal Antibody.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Regulatory Evaluation of Biosimilars: Refinement of Principles Based on the Scientific Evidence and Clinical Experience.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022Review
- Real-World Impact of Switching From Insulin Glargine (LantusFrontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Do Acupuncture Services Reduce Subsequent Utilization of Opioids and Surgical Interventions Compared to Noninvasive Therapies among Patients with Pain Conditions?Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2021Observational
- Trends in Insulin Types and Devices Used by Adults With Type 2 Diabetes in the United States, 2016 to 2020.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Physicochemical and functional characterization of MYL-1501D, a proposed biosimilar to insulin glargine.PloS one · 2021Article
- Immunogenicity and Efficacy of Insulin Glargine Biosimilar Ezelin versus Originator Insulin Glargine in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2021Article
- Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of a new type of recombinant insulin Lisargine injection.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2020Article
- An Efficient Development Paradigm for Biosimilars.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2019Article
- A Propensity Score Matched Comparison of Brand and Biosimilar Basal Insulin in Non-Critical Hospitalized Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Advances in therapy · 2019Article
- Article
- Challenges constraining availability and affordability of insulin in Bengaluru region (Karnataka, India): evidence from a mixed-methods study.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceFor nearly a century, no generic form of insulin has been available in the United States. However, the first biosimilar insulin, Basaglar, was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2015, and subsequently Admelog and Lusduna in 2017.
objectiveTo summarize the scientific evidence comparing the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of biosimilar and reference insulin products. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a systematic review using PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Latin America and Caribbean Health Sciences, South Asian Database of Controlled Clinical Trials, and IndiaMED from their inception through January 14, 2018. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing safety, clinical efficacy, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of any biosimilar insulin with a reference product in adults regardless of sample size and location. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two researchers independently reviewed all titles, abstracts and text; extracted data; and performed quality assessments. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of biosimilar and reference insulin products.
resultsOf 6945 articles screened, 11 studies were included in the data synthesis. LY2963016, Basalog, Basalin, and MK-1293 were compared to Lantus while SAR342434 was compared to Humalog. Three trials enrolled healthy volunteers, five enrolled type 1 diabetics, and two enrolled type 2 diabetics. One study enrolled both healthy and type 1 diabetics. Of the eleven studies, six examined pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic parameters and five examined clinical efficacy and immunogenicity. All studies included adverse events. All PK and/or PD studies showed that comparable parameters of biosimilar and reference products were within the pre-specified equivalence margins. Clinical studies suggested similar clinical efficacy and immunogenicity. Adverse events were similar between the groups across all studies. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Few published studies have compared biosimilar and reference insulins, though those that did suggest that the biosimilars have comparable safety and clinical efficacy as its reference product.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.