Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29676203›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2019

Analysis of -5p and -3p Strands of miR-145 and miR-140 During Mesenchymal Stem Cell Chondrogenic Differentiation.

Jonathan D Kenyon, Olga Sergeeva, Rodrigo A Somoza, Ming Li, Arnold I Caplan, Ahmad M Khalil, Zhenghong Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Non-Coding RNAs in Cartilage Development: An Updated Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  12. There Is No "Stem Cell Mess".Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2019
    Review
  13. Healing with RNA.Injury · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan D Kenyon1 Department of Biology, Skeletal Research Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Olga Sergeeva2 Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Rodrigo A Somoza1 Department of Biology, Skeletal Research Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Ming Li3 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Arnold I Caplan1 Department of Biology, Skeletal Research Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Ahmad M Khalil4 Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Zhenghong Lee2 Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Case Western Reserve University · US

Funding

TR&D-4: Growing Tissue in the Scalable, Modular, Automated, and Closed (SMAC) FoundryP41EB021911 · NIBIB · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI JEAN F WELTER · 2016 to 2026
$13.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB021911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is mediated by transcription factors and small noncoding RNAs such as microRNAs (miRNAs). Each miRNA is initially transcribed as a long transcript, which matures to produce -5p and -3p strands. It is widely believed that the mature and functional miRNA from any given pre-miRNA, usually the -5p strand, is functional, while the opposing -3p strand is degraded. However, recent cartilage literature started to show functional -3p strands for a few miRNAs. This study aimed at examining both -5p and -3p strands of two key miRNAs miR-140 and miR-145, known to be involved in the chondrogenic differentiation of MSCs. The level (copy number) of both -5p and -3p strands of miR-145 and miR-140 along the time line of MSC chondrogenic differentiation was determined by polymerase chain reaction. The gene expression profiles of several genes related to MSC chondrogenesis were compared with these miRNA profiles along the same timeline. While miR-145-3p is declining in step with miR-145-5p in pellet cultures during the process, the -3p strand is only 1-2% of the total miR-145 products. In contrast, the mature -3p and -5p products of miR-140 are found to increase with near-equal molar expression throughout chondrogenic differentiation. Numerous genes are expressed by cartilage progenitor cells during development. One such target gene, Sox9, is a regulatory target of the dominant miR-145-5p, consistent with the data. Further experimental validations are warranted to confirm that ACAN, FOXO1, and RUNX3 as direct targets of miR-145-5p in the context of MSC chondrogenesis. Similarly, TRSP1 and ACAN are worth further validation as direct targets of miR-145-3p. For miR-140, SOX4 shall be further validated as a direct target of miR-140-5p, while KLF4, PTHLH, and WNT5A can be validated as direct targets of miR-140-3p.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationChondrogenesisGene Expression RegulationGene Expression ProfilingHumansKruppel-Like Factor 4Mesenchymal Stem CellsMicroRNAsKLF4 protein, humanKruppel-Like Factor 4MicroRNAsMirn140 microRNA, humanMIRN145 microRNA, human5p versus 3pchondrogenesismiRNA

Identifiers

PMID29676203
PMCPMC6352508
OpenAlexW2804504320

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.