ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2020
Warranty period of normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging in hypertensive patients: A parametric survival analysis.
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The prognostic value of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging is independent of left ventricular size.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- The addition of coronary artery calcium to myocardial perfusion: Double or nothing?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Prognostic value of coronary vascular dysfunction assessed by rubidium-82 PET/CT imaging in patients with resistant hypertension without overt coronary artery disease.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Article
- Temporal trends of abnormal myocardial perfusion imaging in a cohort of Italian subjects: Relation with cardiovascular risk factors.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Article
- The machine learning approach: Artificial intelligence is coming to support critical clinical thinking.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe evaluated the warranty period of a normal stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (MPS) in hypertensive patients. METHODS AND
resultsA total of 471 consecutive hypertensive patients with suspected coronary artery disease and normal perfusion at stress MPS were followed for a mean of 76 ± 21 months. Endpoint events were cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. With Cox analysis, age (hazard ratio 1.1, P < .005) and stress test type (hazard ratio 2.7, P < .005) were independent predictors of events. With parametric Weibull analysis, patients ≤60 years old undergoing exercise stress test remained at low risk for the entire length of follow-up, while the highest probability of events and the major risk acceleration were observed in those > 60 years old who underwent pharmacologic stress test. In patients undergoing exercise test, peak systolic blood pressure (BP; hazard ratio 1.1, P < .005) emerged as predictor of events, and only subjects with peak systolic BP < 160 mmHg remained at low risk for the entire length of follow-up. In contrast, for patients with peak systolic BP ≥180 mmHg, the time to achieve a cumulative cardiac risk level of 3% was 18 months.
conclusionsIn hypertensive patients, the warranty period of a normal stress MPS varies according to stress type and peak systolic BP. A normal stress MPS can be considered reassuring in subjects ≤60 years old who performed exercise stress test and a peak systolic BP < 160 mmHg.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29679222What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.